GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-87106: Fix `inspect.signature.bind` handling of positional-only arguments with `**kwargs` by jacobtylerwalls · Pull Request #103404 · python/cpython Conversation
|
|
👋 @sobolevn would you be interested to take another look? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with the fix in general. However, there are still some things to polish and improve :)
Thanks a lot for your work!
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Thanks for your suggestions, @sobolevn. Should I move some of the new cases to |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@serhiy-storchaka do you have any additional feedback?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Thanks @jacobtylerwalls for the PR, and @serhiy-storchaka for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Thanks @jacobtylerwalls for the PR, and @serhiy-storchaka for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…nly arguments with **kwargs (pythonGH-103404) (cherry picked from commit 9c15202) Co-authored-by: Jacob Walls <[email protected]>
…nly arguments with **kwargs (pythonGH-103404) (cherry picked from commit 9c15202) Co-authored-by: Jacob Walls <[email protected]>
|
GH-118984 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
GH-118985 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…only arguments with **kwargs (GH-103404) (GH-118984) (cherry picked from commit 9c15202) Co-authored-by: Jacob Walls <[email protected]>
…only arguments with **kwargs (GH-103404) (#118985) (cherry picked from commit 9c15202) Co-authored-by: Jacob Walls <[email protected]>
…nly arguments with **kwargs (pythonGH-103404)
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Incorrect behavior of inspect.signature(f).bind
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.