GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.12] gh-105059: Use GCC/clang extension for PyObject union (GH-107232) by miss-islington · Pull Request #107236 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jul 25, 2023 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Anonymous union is new in C11. To prevent compiler warning
when using -pedantic compiler option, use Clang and GCC
extension on C99 and older.
(cherry picked from commit 6261585)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner [email protected]

  • Issue: object.h uses an anonymous union in a struct (older C incompatible) #105059

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@vstinner @miss-islington
pythongh-105059: Use GCC/clang extension for PyObject union (pythonGH…
627d528
…-107232)

Anonymous union is new in C11. To prevent compiler warning
when using -pedantic compiler option, use Clang and GCC
extension on C99 and older.
(cherry picked from commit 6261585)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
This was referenced Jul 25, 2023
object.h uses an anonymous union in a struct (older C incompatible) #105059
Closed
gh-105059: Use GCC/clang extension for PyObject union #107232
Merged
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added skip news awaiting review labels Jul 25, 2023
@vstinner
vstinner enabled auto-merge (squash) July 25, 2023 12:29
@vstinner
vstinner merged commit 0cf5f6a into python:3.12 Jul 25, 2023
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting review label Jul 25, 2023
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-6261585-3.12 branch July 25, 2023 13:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@miss-islington @vstinner @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.