GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-108082: Use PyErr_FormatUnraisable() by serhiy-storchaka · Pull Request #111580 · python/cpython
Conversation
serhiy-storchaka
commented
Oct 31, 2023
•
edited by bedevere-app
Bot
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Replace most of calls of _PyErr_WriteUnraisableMsg() and some calls of PyErr_WriteUnraisable(NULL) with PyErr_FormatUnraisable().
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Replace most of calls of _PyErr_WriteUnraisableMsg() and some
calls of PyErr_WriteUnraisable(NULL) with PyErr_FormatUnraisable().
|
|
if (_PyErr_Occurred(tstate)) {
|
|
|
_PyErr_WriteUnraisableMsg("in tp_clear of",
|
|
|
(PyObject*)Py_TYPE(op));
|
|
|
PyErr_FormatUnraisable("Exception ignored in tp_clear of %.200s",
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO %.200s is a bug here. We should no longer truncate type names if they are too long. Many years ago, Python had an internal buffer of a fixed size and so the overall string must not be too long. But this has been fixed.
Please don't truncate type names.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
serhiy-storchaka reacted with thumbs up emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Comment on lines
+905
to
+907
|
|
PyErr_FormatUnraisable("Exception ignored in m_clear of module%s%V\n",
|
|
|
m->md_name ? " " : "",
|
|
|
m->md_name, "");
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
PyErr_FormatUnraisable("Exception ignored in m_clear of module%s%V\n", |
|
m->md_name ? " " : "", |
|
m->md_name, ""); |
|
PyErr_FormatUnraisable("Exception ignored in m_clear of module%s%V", |
|
m->md_name ? " " : "", |
|
m->md_name); |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
|
PyType_WatchCallback cb = interp->type_watchers[i];
|
|
|
if (cb && (cb(type) < 0)) {
|
|
|
PyErr_WriteUnraisable((PyObject *)type);
|
|
|
PyErr_FormatUnraisable("Exception ignored in watcher callback for %R", i, type);
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you want to log i variable, you should add %i somewhere.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. I just left two minor suggestions.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
|
PyErr_WriteUnraisable(NULL);
|
|
|
PyErr_FormatUnraisable("Exception ignored in m_clear of module%s%V",
|
|
|
m->md_name ? " " : "",
|
|
|
m->md_name, "");
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The last "" is not used, it can be removed.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️
Hi! The buildbot s390x Fedora Clang 3.x has failed when building commit 970e719.
What do you need to do:
- Don't panic.
- Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
- Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/3/builds/4870) and take a look at the build logs.
- Check if the failure is related to this commit (970e719) or if it is a false positive.
- If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.
You can take a look at the buildbot page here:
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/3/builds/4870
Summary of the results of the build (if available):
==
Click to see traceback logs
remote: Enumerating objects: 53, done.
remote: Counting objects: 1% (1/53)
remote: Counting objects: 3% (2/53)
remote: Counting objects: 5% (3/53)
remote: Counting objects: 7% (4/53)
remote: Counting objects: 9% (5/53)
remote: Counting objects: 11% (6/53)
remote: Counting objects: 13% (7/53)
remote: Counting objects: 15% (8/53)
remote: Counting objects: 16% (9/53)
remote: Counting objects: 18% (10/53)
remote: Counting objects: 20% (11/53)
remote: Counting objects: 22% (12/53)
remote: Counting objects: 24% (13/53)
remote: Counting objects: 26% (14/53)
remote: Counting objects: 28% (15/53)
remote: Counting objects: 30% (16/53)
remote: Counting objects: 32% (17/53)
remote: Counting objects: 33% (18/53)
remote: Counting objects: 35% (19/53)
remote: Counting objects: 37% (20/53)
remote: Counting objects: 39% (21/53)
remote: Counting objects: 41% (22/53)
remote: Counting objects: 43% (23/53)
remote: Counting objects: 45% (24/53)
remote: Counting objects: 47% (25/53)
remote: Counting objects: 49% (26/53)
remote: Counting objects: 50% (27/53)
remote: Counting objects: 52% (28/53)
remote: Counting objects: 54% (29/53)
remote: Counting objects: 56% (30/53)
remote: Counting objects: 58% (31/53)
remote: Counting objects: 60% (32/53)
remote: Counting objects: 62% (33/53)
remote: Counting objects: 64% (34/53)
remote: Counting objects: 66% (35/53)
remote: Counting objects: 67% (36/53)
remote: Counting objects: 69% (37/53)
remote: Counting objects: 71% (38/53)
remote: Counting objects: 73% (39/53)
remote: Counting objects: 75% (40/53)
remote: Counting objects: 77% (41/53)
remote: Counting objects: 79% (42/53)
remote: Counting objects: 81% (43/53)
remote: Counting objects: 83% (44/53)
remote: Counting objects: 84% (45/53)
remote: Counting objects: 86% (46/53)
remote: Counting objects: 88% (47/53)
remote: Counting objects: 90% (48/53)
remote: Counting objects: 92% (49/53)
remote: Counting objects: 94% (50/53)
remote: Counting objects: 96% (51/53)
remote: Counting objects: 98% (52/53)
remote: Counting objects: 100% (53/53)
remote: Counting objects: 100% (53/53), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 4% (1/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 8% (2/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 12% (3/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 16% (4/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 20% (5/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 24% (6/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 28% (7/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 32% (8/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 36% (9/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 40% (10/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 44% (11/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 48% (12/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 52% (13/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 56% (14/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 60% (15/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 64% (16/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 68% (17/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 72% (18/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 76% (19/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 80% (20/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 84% (21/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 88% (22/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 92% (23/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 96% (24/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (25/25)
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (25/25), done.
remote: Total 27 (delta 26), reused 2 (delta 2), pack-reused 0
From https://github.com/python/cpython
* branch main -> FETCH_HEAD
Note: switching to '970e719a7a829bddc647bbaa668dd8603abdddef'.
You are in 'detached HEAD' state. You can look around, make experimental
changes and commit them, and you can discard any commits you make in this
state without impacting any branches by switching back to a branch.
If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create, you may
do so (now or later) by using -c with the switch command. Example:
git switch -c <new-branch-name>
Or undo this operation with:
git switch -
Turn off this advice by setting config variable advice.detachedHead to false
HEAD is now at 970e719a7a gh-108082: Use PyErr_FormatUnraisable() (GH-111580)
Switched to and reset branch 'main'
configure: WARNING: s390x-ibm-linux-gnu/clang is not supported
configure: WARNING:
Platform "s390x-ibm-linux-gnu" with compiler "clang" is not supported by the
CPython core team, see https://peps.python.org/pep-0011/ for more information.
make: *** [Makefile:2065: buildbottest] Error 3
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
I wanted to do this change for many years. It's awful to get a warning without any context :-( Thanks for this nice enhancement! I like PyErr_FormatUnraisable() API!
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
We both wanted it. But other tasks had higher priorities.
|
vstinner reacted with heart emoji
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
FullteaR
pushed a commit
to FullteaR/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2023
Replace most of calls of _PyErr_WriteUnraisableMsg() and some
calls of PyErr_WriteUnraisable(NULL) with PyErr_FormatUnraisable().
Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
aisk
pushed a commit
to aisk/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
Replace most of calls of _PyErr_WriteUnraisableMsg() and some
calls of PyErr_WriteUnraisable(NULL) with PyErr_FormatUnraisable().
Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
Glyphack
pushed a commit
to Glyphack/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2024
Replace most of calls of _PyErr_WriteUnraisableMsg() and some
calls of PyErr_WriteUnraisable(NULL) with PyErr_FormatUnraisable().
Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|