GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-112433: Add optional _align_ attribute to ctypes.Structure by monkeyman192 · Pull Request #113790 · python/cpython

Conversation

@monkeyman192

@monkeyman192 monkeyman192 commented Jan 7, 2024 •
edited by github-actions Bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds an _align_ attribute to ctypes.Structure's so that is it possible to set it manually.

  • Issue: Add ability to force alignment of ctypes.Structure #112433
  • Issue: Add ability to force alignment of ctypes.Structure #112433

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--113790.org.readthedocs.build/

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@monkeyman192
Add optional _align_ attribute to ctypes.Structure
a6ef3ac
@ghost

ghost commented Jan 7, 2024 •
edited by ghost
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.
CLA signed

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@bedevere-app

bedevere-app Bot commented Jan 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the skip news label instead.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the awaiting review label Jan 7, 2024
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request Jan 7, 2024
Add ability to force alignment of ctypes.Structure #112433
Closed
serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka reviewed Jan 26, 2024
View reviewed changes

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is an interesting idea.

But what should be the size and the alignment of B in the following example?

class A(Structure):
    x: c_uint32

class B(A):
    _align_ = 8
    y: c_uint32

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@monkeyman192

monkeyman192 commented Jan 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

It is an interesting idea.

But what should be the size and the alignment of B in the following example?

class A(Structure):
    x: c_uint32

class B(A):
    _align_ = 8
    y: c_uint32

Thanks for the review!

My intuition would say "8 and 8".
Running the code shows that while the size is 8, the alignment of B is 4, not 8 as specified.
To sanity check I wrote a c++ equivalent of the above and it has size 8, alignment 8.
I'll work on fixing this issue and add some unit tests to cover these cases also, thanks!
I'll also add the news snippet which I have been meaning to do...

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

blurb-it Bot and others added 2 commits January 28, 2024 02:46
@blurb-it
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
e2cceec
@monkeyman192
Fix issue with aligned subclasses
2329fa3
serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka reviewed Jan 28, 2024
View reviewed changes
Comment thread Modules/_ctypes/stgdict.c Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@serhiy-storchaka

serhiy-storchaka commented Jan 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

!buildbot s390x

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@bedevere-bot

bedevere-bot commented Jan 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @serhiy-storchaka for commit 2329fa3 🤖

The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression: s390x

The builders matched are:

  • s390x RHEL7 LTO + PGO PR
  • s390x Fedora LTO PR
  • s390x RHEL7 LTO PR
  • s390x SLES PR
  • s390x Fedora Rawhide LTO PR
  • s390x Fedora Clang Installed PR
  • s390x RHEL8 Refleaks PR
  • s390x Fedora Rawhide LTO + PGO PR
  • s390x RHEL8 LTO + PGO PR
  • s390x RHEL8 PR
  • s390x Fedora Rawhide Refleaks PR
  • s390x Fedora Refleaks PR
  • s390x Fedora Clang PR
  • s390x Fedora LTO + PGO PR
  • s390x Fedora Rawhide PR
  • s390x Fedora PR
  • s390x RHEL8 LTO PR
  • s390x Fedora Rawhide Clang PR
  • s390x Debian PR
  • s390x RHEL7 Refleaks PR
  • s390x RHEL7 PR
  • s390x Fedora Rawhide Clang Installed PR
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@serhiy-storchaka

serhiy-storchaka commented Jan 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/390/builds/1350/steps/5/logs/stdio

======================================================================
FAIL: test_aligned_string (test.test_ctypes.test_aligned_structures.TestAlignedStructures.test_aligned_string)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/pull_request.edelsohn-debian-z/build/Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py", line 26, in test_aligned_string
    self.assertEqual(main.first, 7)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 117440512 != 7
======================================================================
FAIL: test_aligned_struct_in_union (test.test_ctypes.test_aligned_structures.TestAlignedStructures.test_aligned_struct_in_union)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/pull_request.edelsohn-debian-z/build/Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py", line 158, in test_aligned_struct_in_union
    self.assertEqual(main.first, 1)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 16777216 != 1
======================================================================
FAIL: test_aligned_structures (test.test_ctypes.test_aligned_structures.TestAlignedStructures.test_aligned_structures)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/pull_request.edelsohn-debian-z/build/Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py", line 64, in test_aligned_structures
    self.assertEqual(main.y, 7)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 117440512 != 7
======================================================================
FAIL: test_aligned_subclasses (test.test_ctypes.test_aligned_structures.TestAlignedStructures.test_aligned_subclasses)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/pull_request.edelsohn-debian-z/build/Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py", line 106, in test_aligned_subclasses
    self.assertEqual(main.a, 1)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 16777216 != 1
======================================================================
FAIL: test_aligned_union (test.test_ctypes.test_aligned_structures.TestAlignedStructures.test_aligned_union)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/pull_request.edelsohn-debian-z/build/Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py", line 129, in test_aligned_union
    self.assertEqual(main.first, 1)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 16777216 != 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@monkeyman192
Improve tests to pass on big endian machines
ebaed7e
@monkeyman192

monkeyman192 commented Jan 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

In the process of making the tests run with both big and little endian versions of the Structure and Union classes I found something curious...

from ctypes import *

class AlignedUnion(BigEndianUnion):
    _fields_ = [
        ("a", c_uint32),
        ("b", c_int32),
    ]

class Main(BigEndianStructure):
    _fields_ = [
        ("first", c_uint32),
        ("union", AlignedUnion),
    ]

m = Main()

If I run this on my machine (little endian), I get the following error:
TypeError: This type does not support other endian: <class '__main__.AlignedUnion'>

This seems like a bug and is the reason the last few tests look the way they do...

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@serhiy-storchaka
Merge branch 'main' into add_structure_alignment
6b183b5
@serhiy-storchaka

serhiy-storchaka commented Jan 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It was fixed not long time ago in #105102.

monkeyman192 reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@monkeyman192

monkeyman192 commented Jan 28, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

It was fixed not long time ago in #105102.

Ok great!

I know that as per the requirements for PR's it's required to make each commit separate and to not rebase, but is it fine to rebase the whole branch onto the current head so that I get the fix for this? I haven't contributed before and just want to make sure I'm following the right procedure...

Edit: Oh I see you already merged the code into the branch, thanks!

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@serhiy-storchaka

serhiy-storchaka commented Jan 28, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Don't rebase, just merge. I just merged main into your branch, you have to pull the changes.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@monkeyman192
Further improvements to tests
c8b37d4
serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka reviewed Jan 29, 2024
View reviewed changes

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some questions and suggestions to tests. Please add more checks for offsets, alignments and sizes.

Interesting, how does setting _align_ in a Union subclass affect it?

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py Outdated
self.assertEqual(main.first, 7)
self.assertEqual(main.string.value, b'hello world!')
self.assertEqual(
bytes(main.string.__buffer__(inspect.BufferFlags.SIMPLE)),

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka Jan 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe simply bytes(main.string)?

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py Outdated
self.assertEqual(main.string.value, b'hello world!')
self.assertEqual(
bytes(main.string.__buffer__(inspect.BufferFlags.SIMPLE)),
b'\x68\x65\x6c\x6c\x6f\x20\x77\x6f\x72\x6c\x64\x21\x00\x00\x00\x00'

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka Jan 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

b'hello world!\0\0\0\0' could be more readable.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py Outdated
Comment on lines +153 to +156
if ubase == LittleEndianUnion:
self.assertEqual(bytes(main.union.b), b"\3\0\0\0\4\0\0\0")
else:
self.assertEqual(bytes(main.union.b), b"\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\4")

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka Jan 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is simply data[8:].

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py Outdated
class TestAlignedStructures(unittest.TestCase):
def test_aligned_string(self):
for base, data in (
(LittleEndianStructure, bytearray(

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka Jan 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can also use struct.pack() to generate data. It may be more compact and more readable.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@monkeyman192
Test cleanup and improvements
68e2d61
@monkeyman192

monkeyman192 commented Jan 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for the thorough review!
I believe I have addressed all the comments and added some further tests to test the case of a subclassed Union where the subclass has an alignment.
I used struct.pack in most places to clean it except for one where the format string was just too ugly looking to make it obvious what the data would be at a glance.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka reviewed Jan 30, 2024
View reviewed changes

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your response @monkeyman192. I have yet few suggestions for polishing test.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

monkeyman192 reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction
Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py
)
self.assertEqual(bytes(main.string), b'hello world!\0\0\0\0')
self.assertEqual(Main.string.offset, 16)
self.assertEqual(Main.string.size, 16)

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka Jan 30, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is not affected by the _align_ setting, because its size was already 16. Maybe make the value field type c_char * 12? Then the _align_ setting will affect also the size of Aligned.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py Outdated
("y", c_uint32),
("x", c_ubyte),
("y", SomeBools),
("z", c_uint32),

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka Jan 30, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What if make z a byte and make SomeBools containing only 2 fields? Then without the _align_ setting Main can be packed in just 4 bytes. The _align_ setting will made larger difference.

Or just set _align_ to 8. This would cover also the next test.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py
("y", SomeBoolsTooBig),
("z", c_uint32),
]
with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka Jan 30, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is still not very informative test. If you want to test that the _align_ setting affects the size of Main, you can do this more directly by checking sizeof(Main). If you want to check also content, use the data of size 12.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@monkeyman192 monkeyman192 Jan 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess with this test I was just wanting to ensure that the appropriate error is raised when you have a Structure/Union with an alignment which will cause the size it expects to be bigger than what it is given. Rather than checking anything about the content itself.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py Outdated
Comment on lines +212 to +213
self.assertEqual(main.unsigned, 0xD6)
self.assertEqual(main.signed, -42)

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka Jan 30, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, it is difficult to test unions with different byte order. But your test will also pass if badding bytes are added before unsigned (i.e. if Main.unsigned.offset is 7). I would use all different bytes in the input data, and tested:

            self.assertEqual(main.unsigned, data[0])
            self.assertEqual(main.signed, data[0] - 256)

Please add also checks for alignments, offsets and sizes.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread Lib/test/test_ctypes/test_aligned_structures.py
self.assertEqual(bytes(main.string), b'hello world!\0\0\0\0')
self.assertEqual(Main.string.offset, 16)
self.assertEqual(Main.string.size, 16)
self.assertEqual(alignment(main.string), 16)

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka Jan 30, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does alignment(Main.string) work?

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@monkeyman192 monkeyman192 Jan 30, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does not since Main.string is a ctypes.CField which has no alignment info.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@monkeyman192
More test improvements
f6a93dd
@monkeyman192

monkeyman192 commented Feb 1, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I realised that I have neither documented nor tested the case of having both _align_ and _pack_ attributes. I'll add that also as I think it's important to understand how it should behave.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

aisk
aisk reviewed Feb 1, 2024
View reviewed changes
Comment thread Doc/library/ctypes.rst Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@monkeyman192
Add extra test and fix documentation typo
a7bc0fe
@monkeyman192

monkeyman192 commented Feb 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sorry for the ping @serhiy-storchaka just checking to see if there was anything else I needed to address with this.
I believe I have covered the points you raised previously as well as the typo raised in the documentation.
Let me know if there are any further changes I need to make

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka approved these changes Feb 12, 2024
View reviewed changes

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

monkeyman192 reacted with hooray emoji
All reactions
  • 🎉 1 reaction
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting review labels Feb 12, 2024
@serhiy-storchaka

serhiy-storchaka commented Feb 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

!buildbot s390x Debian

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@bedevere-bot

bedevere-bot commented Feb 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @serhiy-storchaka for commit a7bc0fe 🤖

The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression: s390x Debian

The builders matched are:

  • s390x Debian PR
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@monkeyman192
monkeyman192 requested a review from aisk February 14, 2024 20:14
@monkeyman192

monkeyman192 commented Feb 14, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ah, I just realised that this was already in the awaiting merge stage but I requested a review from aisk... Sorry about that...

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka merged commit 298bcdc into python:main Feb 15, 2024
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot removed the awaiting merge label Feb 15, 2024
diegorusso pushed a commit to diegorusso/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2024
@monkeyman192 @diegorusso
pythongh-112433: Add optional _align_ attribute to ctypes.Structure (p…
d61ab3f
…ythonGH-113790)
LukasWoodtli pushed a commit to LukasWoodtli/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
@monkeyman192 @LukasWoodtli
pythongh-112433: Add optional _align_ attribute to ctypes.Structure (p…
4a5881c
…ythonGH-113790)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka approved these changes
@aisk aisk Awaiting requested review from aisk

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@monkeyman192 @serhiy-storchaka @bedevere-bot @aisk
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.