GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |
GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.9] gh-113171: gh-65056: Fix "private" (non-global) IP address ranges (GH-113179) (GH-113186) (GH-118177) by encukou · Pull Request #118472 · python/cpython Conversation
Member
Note that 3.10 & below has slightly different semantics of GH-113171: Fix "private" (non-global) IP address ranges (GH-113179)The _private_networks variables, used by various is_private implementations, This patch updates the ranges with what was missing or otherwise incorrect. 100.64.0.0/10 is left alone, for now, as it's been made special in [1]. The _address_exclude_many() call returns 8 networks for IPv4, 121 networks for IPv6. [1] #61602 (cherry picked from commit 2a4cbf1) GH-65056: Improve the IP address' is_global/is_private documentation (GH-113186)It wasn't clear what the semantics of is_global/is_private are and, (cherry picked from commit 40d75c2) (cherry picked from commit f86b17a)
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions…s ranges (pythonGH-113179) (pythonGH-113186) (pythonGH-118177) * pythonGH-113171: Fix "private" (non-global) IP address ranges (pythonGH-113179) The _private_networks variables, used by various is_private implementations, were missing some ranges and at the same time had overly strict ranges (where there are more specific ranges considered globally reachable by the IANA registries). This patch updates the ranges with what was missing or otherwise incorrect. 100.64.0.0/10 is left alone, for now, as it's been made special in [1]. The _address_exclude_many() call returns 8 networks for IPv4, 121 networks for IPv6. [1] python#61602 * pythonGH-65056: Improve the IP address' is_global/is_private documentation (pythonGH-113186) It wasn't clear what the semantics of is_global/is_private are and, when one gets to the bottom of it, it's not quite so simple (hence the exceptions listed). (cherry picked from commit 2a4cbf1) (cherry picked from commit 40d75c2) --------- (cherry picked from commit f86b17a) Co-authored-by: Jakub Stasiak <[email protected]> In 3.10 and below, is_private checks whether the network and broadcast
address are both private.
In later versions (where the test wss backported from), it checks
whether they both are in the same private network.
For 0.0.0.0/0, both 0.0.0.0 and 255.225.255.255 are private,
but one is in 0.0.0.0/8 ("This network") and the other in
255.255.255.255/32 ("Limited broadcast").
That's a lot of semicolons!
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
frenzymadness
pushed a commit
to frenzymadness/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
… address ranges (pythonGH-113179) (pythonGH-113186) (pythonGH-118177) (pythonGH-118472) The _private_networks variables, used by various is_private implementations, were missing some ranges and at the same time had overly strict ranges (where there are more specific ranges considered globally reachable by the IANA registries). This patch updates the ranges with what was missing or otherwise incorrect. 100.64.0.0/10 is left alone, for now, as it's been made special in [1]. The _address_exclude_many() call returns 8 networks for IPv4, 121 networks for IPv6. [1] python#61602 In 3.10 and below, is_private checks whether the network and broadcast address are both private. In later versions (where the test wss backported from), it checks whether they both are in the same private network. For 0.0.0.0/0, both 0.0.0.0 and 255.225.255.255 are private, but one is in 0.0.0.0/8 ("This network") and the other in 255.255.255.255/32 ("Limited broadcast"). --------- Co-authored-by: Jakub Stasiak <[email protected]>
frenzymadness
pushed a commit
to fedora-python/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
… address ranges (pythonGH-113179) (pythonGH-113186) (pythonGH-118177) (pythonGH-118472) The _private_networks variables, used by various is_private implementations, were missing some ranges and at the same time had overly strict ranges (where there are more specific ranges considered globally reachable by the IANA registries). This patch updates the ranges with what was missing or otherwise incorrect. 100.64.0.0/10 is left alone, for now, as it's been made special in [1]. The _address_exclude_many() call returns 8 networks for IPv4, 121 networks for IPv6. [1] python#61602 In 3.10 and below, is_private checks whether the network and broadcast address are both private. In later versions (where the test wss backported from), it checks whether they both are in the same private network. For 0.0.0.0/0, both 0.0.0.0 and 255.225.255.255 are private, but one is in 0.0.0.0/8 ("This network") and the other in 255.255.255.255/32 ("Limited broadcast"). --------- Co-authored-by: Jakub Stasiak <[email protected]>
stratakis
pushed a commit
to stratakis/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
… address ranges (pythonGH-113179) (pythonGH-113186) (pythonGH-118177) (pythonGH-118472) The _private_networks variables, used by various is_private implementations, were missing some ranges and at the same time had overly strict ranges (where there are more specific ranges considered globally reachable by the IANA registries). This patch updates the ranges with what was missing or otherwise incorrect. 100.64.0.0/10 is left alone, for now, as it's been made special in [1]. The _address_exclude_many() call returns 8 networks for IPv4, 121 networks for IPv6. [1] python#61602 In 3.10 and below, is_private checks whether the network and broadcast address are both private. In later versions (where the test wss backported from), it checks whether they both are in the same private network. For 0.0.0.0/0, both 0.0.0.0 and 255.225.255.255 are private, but one is in 0.0.0.0/8 ("This network") and the other in 255.255.255.255/32 ("Limited broadcast").
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersNo reviewsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabelsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. 3 participantsAdd this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |