GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-118912: Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide by shaunagm · Pull Request #119232 · python/cpython
Conversation
shaunagm
commented
May 20, 2024
•
edited by github-actions
Bot
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Note: I am a first-time contributor, so apologies if I've missed some important norms or processes.
This is an attempt to fix #118912 by removing the description of a bug that was removed in Python 3.5. I noticed that elsewhere in the documentation there were comments about when something had been added or removed or changed, so I tried using that here. Not sure if that was actually appropriate.
I had one other question: the autospeccing guide feels a little out of place here. Everything else seems to be primarily for reference, while this guide feels like more of a howto. Should it be moved to a howto section, and merely linked here? If we want to keep it in this part of the docs, should it be moved next to create_autospec or even submerged into it? Eager to get your thoughts on this question, and to get overall feedback on this PR.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--119232.org.readthedocs.build/
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ghost
commented
May 20, 2024
•
edited by ghost
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement. 
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
shaunagm reacted with heart emoji
|
Thanks @shaunagm for the PR, and @willingc for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12.
🐍🍒⛏🤖
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Thanks @shaunagm for the PR, and @willingc for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13.
🐍🍒⛏🤖
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…eccing guide (pythonGH-119232)
* Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide
* Make autospeccing note text more succint and lint whitespace
* Add linting changes (missed in last commit)
---------
(cherry picked from commit 7e57640)
Co-authored-by: Shauna <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <[email protected]>
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…eccing guide (pythonGH-119232)
* Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide
* Make autospeccing note text more succint and lint whitespace
* Add linting changes (missed in last commit)
---------
(cherry picked from commit 7e57640)
Co-authored-by: Shauna <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <[email protected]>
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
willingc
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…peccing guide (GH-119232) (#119283)
gh-118912: Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide (GH-119232)
* Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide
* Make autospeccing note text more succint and lint whitespace
* Add linting changes (missed in last commit)
---------
(cherry picked from commit 7e57640)
Co-authored-by: Shauna <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <[email protected]>
willingc
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…peccing guide (GH-119232) (#119284)
gh-118912: Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide (GH-119232)
* Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide
* Make autospeccing note text more succint and lint whitespace
* Add linting changes (missed in last commit)
---------
(cherry picked from commit 7e57640)
Co-authored-by: Shauna <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <[email protected]>
estyxx
pushed a commit
to estyxx/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2024
…eccing guide (python#119232)
* Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide
* Make autospeccing note text more succint and lint whitespace
* Add linting changes (missed in last commit)
---------
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <[email protected]>
Reviewers
nedbat
nedbat approved these changes
willingc
willingc approved these changes
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|