GeezerVison is showing github.com — GH-73991: Use same signature for `shutil._rmtree_[un]safe()`. by barneygale · Pull Request #120517 · python/cpython
Conversation
barneygale
commented
Jun 14, 2024
•
edited by bedevere-app
Bot
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Preparatory work for moving _rmtree_unsafe() and _rmtree_safe_fd() to pathlib._os so that they can be used from both shutil and pathlib.
Move implementation-specific setup from rmtree() into the safe/unsafe functions, and give them the same signature (path, dir_fd, onexc).
In the tests, mock os.open rather than _rmtree_safe_fd() to ensure the FD-based walk is used, and replace a couple references to shutil._use_fd_functions with shutil.rmtree.avoids_symlink_attacks (which has the same value).
No change of behaviour.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Preparatory work for moving `_rmtree_unsafe()` and `_rmtree_safe_fd()` to
`pathlib._os` so that they can be used from both `shutil` and `pathlib`.
Move implementation-specific setup from `rmtree()` into the safe/unsafe
functions, and give them the same signature `(path, dir_fd, onexc)`.
In the tests, mock `os.open` rather than `_rmtree_safe_fd()` to ensure the
FD-based walk is used, and replace a couple references to
`shutil._use_fd_functions` with `shutil.rmtree.avoids_symlink_attacks`
(which has the same value).
No change of behaviour.
mrahtz
pushed a commit
to mrahtz/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2024
…ython#120517)
Preparatory work for moving `_rmtree_unsafe()` and `_rmtree_safe_fd()` to
`pathlib._os` so that they can be used from both `shutil` and `pathlib`.
Move implementation-specific setup from `rmtree()` into the safe/unsafe
functions, and give them the same signature `(path, dir_fd, onexc)`.
In the tests, mock `os.open` rather than `_rmtree_safe_fd()` to ensure the
FD-based walk is used, and replace a couple references to
`shutil._use_fd_functions` with `shutil.rmtree.avoids_symlink_attacks`
(which has the same value).
No change of behaviour.
estyxx
pushed a commit
to estyxx/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2024
…ython#120517)
Preparatory work for moving `_rmtree_unsafe()` and `_rmtree_safe_fd()` to
`pathlib._os` so that they can be used from both `shutil` and `pathlib`.
Move implementation-specific setup from `rmtree()` into the safe/unsafe
functions, and give them the same signature `(path, dir_fd, onexc)`.
In the tests, mock `os.open` rather than `_rmtree_safe_fd()` to ensure the
FD-based walk is used, and replace a couple references to
`shutil._use_fd_functions` with `shutil.rmtree.avoids_symlink_attacks`
(which has the same value).
No change of behaviour.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|