GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-122361: Use proper `PyUnicodeWriter_*` API in `constevaluator_call` by sobolevn · Pull Request #122362 · python/cpython

Conversation

@sobolevn

@sobolevn sobolevn commented Jul 27, 2024 •
edited by bedevere-app Bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • Issue: _PyUnicodeWriter* is passed where PyUnicodeWriter* is expected #122361

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@sobolevn
pythongh-122361: Use proper PyUnicodeWriter_* API in `constevaluato…
44e5841
…r_call`
@sobolevn
sobolevn requested a review from JelleZijlstra July 27, 2024 17:47
@sobolevn
sobolevn requested a review from markshannon as a code owner July 27, 2024 17:47
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request Jul 27, 2024
_PyUnicodeWriter* is passed where PyUnicodeWriter* is expected #122361
Closed
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the awaiting core review label Jul 27, 2024
@sobolevn sobolevn added the skip news label Jul 27, 2024
@sobolevn sobolevn mentioned this pull request Jul 27, 2024
gh-119180: Add evaluate functions for type params and type aliases #122212
Merged
picnixz
picnixz reviewed Jul 27, 2024
View reviewed changes

@picnixz picnixz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How much is the overhead of using the public API instead of the (slightly, or perhaps more) faster private API?

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread Objects/typevarobject.c Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Comment thread Objects/typevarobject.c Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@sobolevn
Address review
4eb382a
JelleZijlstra
JelleZijlstra approved these changes Jul 27, 2024
View reviewed changes

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, thought I got all the warnings.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting core review labels Jul 27, 2024
@sobolevn
sobolevn merged commit 04eb5c8 into python:main Jul 27, 2024
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot removed the awaiting merge label Jul 27, 2024
@sobolevn

sobolevn commented Jul 27, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

How much is the overhead of using the public API instead of the (slightly, or perhaps more) faster private API?

Oups, sorry, @picnixz, I missed this question!
I don't really think that it really matters in this use-case :)

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@picnixz

picnixz commented Jul 27, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No worry (I also don't think it matters (I didn't know in which context it was being used actually))

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@picnixz picnixz picnixz left review comments
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra approved these changes
@markshannon markshannon Awaiting requested review from markshannon

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@sobolevn @picnixz @JelleZijlstra
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.