GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.14] gh-85045: clarified that the underlying buffer of a TextIOBase can be a RawIOBase (GH-134372) by miss-islington · Pull Request #134374 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented May 20, 2025 •
edited by github-actions Bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Added a clarification that the underlying binary buffer of a TextIOBase can be a BufferedIOBase OR a RawIOBase
(cherry picked from commit 36eb711)

Co-authored-by: Alex Kautz [email protected]

  • Issue: io.TextIOBase.buffer is not necessarily a buffer #85045

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--134374.org.readthedocs.build/

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Alex Kautz @miss-islington
pythongh-85045: clarified that the underlying buffer of a TextIOBase …
d495021 
…can be a RawIOBase (pythonGH-134372)

Added a clarification that the underlying binary buffer of a TextIOBase can be a BufferedIOBase OR a RawIOBase
(cherry picked from commit 36eb711)

Co-authored-by: Alex Kautz <[email protected]>
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request May 20, 2025
io.TextIOBase.buffer is not necessarily a buffer #85045
Closed
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news labels May 20, 2025
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request May 20, 2025
gh-85045: clarified that the underlying buffer of a TextIOBase can be a RawIOBase #134372
Merged
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the awaiting review label May 20, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot added this to Docs PRs May 20, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to Todo in Docs PRs May 20, 2025
@gpshead
gpshead merged commit 899ce7d into python:3.14 May 20, 2025
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot removed the awaiting review label May 20, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Todo to Done in Docs PRs May 20, 2025
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-36eb711-3.14 branch January 2, 2026 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

Docs PRs
Status: Done

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@miss-islington @gpshead
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.