GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-127146: Emscripten: Add test_sample_profiler skips where needed by hoodmane · Pull Request #137815 · python/cpython

Conversation

hoodmane commented Aug 15, 2025 •

edited by bedevere-app Bot

Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link

Copy Markdown

Contributor

These are failing on the main branch in the Emscripten build bot.

Issue: Emscripten: Get test suite passing #127146

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions


          pythongh-127146: Emscripten: Add test_sample_profiler skips where needed

079a1d5

bedevere-app Bot added awaiting review tests Tests in the Lib/test dir labels

Aug 15, 2025

hoodmane added skip news and removed tests

Tests in the Lib/test dir

awaiting review labels

Aug 15, 2025

bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request

Aug 15, 2025

Emscripten: Get test suite passing #127146

Closed

hoodmane added the OS-emscripten label

Aug 15, 2025

hoodmane requested a review from freakboy3742

August 15, 2025 14:03

freakboy3742 commented Aug 17, 2025

Copy link

Copy Markdown

Contributor

!buildbot emscripten

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

bedevere-bot commented Aug 17, 2025

Copy link

Copy Markdown

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @freakboy3742 for commit 079a1d5 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F137815%2Fmerge

The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression: emscripten

The builders matched are:

WASM Emscripten PR

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

freakboy3742 commented Aug 17, 2025

Copy link

Copy Markdown

Contributor

The buildbot is failing, but that's because of a second (pre-existing) failure in test_calendar.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

freakboy3742 approved these changes

Aug 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

freakboy3742 left a comment

Copy link

Copy Markdown

Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

bedevere-app Bot added the awaiting merge label

Aug 17, 2025

freakboy3742 merged commit bc28724 into python:main

Aug 17, 2025

bedevere-app Bot removed the awaiting merge label

Aug 17, 2025

bedevere-bot commented Aug 18, 2025

Copy link

Copy Markdown

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot s390x RHEL9 Refleaks 3.x (tier-3) has failed when building commit bc28724.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/1589/builds/1992) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (bc28724) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/1589/builds/1992

Failed tests:

test.test_multiprocessing_fork.test_processes

Failed subtests:

test_interrupt - test.test_multiprocessing_fork.test_processes.WithProcessesTestProcess.test_interrupt

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 588, in test_interrupt
    exitcode = self._kill_process(multiprocessing.Process.interrupt)
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 570, in _kill_process
    self.assertEqual(join(), None)
                     ~~~~^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 250, in __call__
    return self.func(*args, **kwds)
           ~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/process.py", line 156, in join
    res = self._popen.wait(timeout)
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/popen_fork.py", line 44, in wait
    return self.poll(os.WNOHANG if timeout == 0.0 else 0)
           ~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/popen_fork.py", line 28, in poll
    pid, sts = os.waitpid(self.pid, flag)
               ~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 566, in handler
    raise RuntimeError('join took too long: %s' % p)
RuntimeError: join took too long: <Process name='Process-2102' pid=2233046 parent=2212940 started daemon>


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/process.py", line 320, in _bootstrap
    self.run()
    ~~~~~~~~^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/process.py", line 108, in run
    self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 518, in _sleep_some_event
    time.sleep(100)
    ~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
KeyboardInterrupt
k


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/process.py", line 320, in _bootstrap
    self.run()
    ~~~~~~~~^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/process.py", line 108, in run
    self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 517, in _sleep_some_event
    event.set()
    ~~~~~~~~~^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 344, in set
    with self._cond:
         ^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 242, in __exit__
    return self._lock.__exit__(*args)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 100, in __exit__
    return self._semlock.__exit__(*args)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^
KeyboardInterrupt
k


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 588, in test_interrupt
    exitcode = self._kill_process(multiprocessing.Process.interrupt)
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 570, in _kill_process
    self.assertEqual(join(), None)
                     ~~~~^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 250, in __call__
    return self.func(*args, **kwds)
           ~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/process.py", line 156, in join
    res = self._popen.wait(timeout)
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/popen_fork.py", line 44, in wait
    return self.poll(os.WNOHANG if timeout == 0.0 else 0)
           ~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/multiprocessing/popen_fork.py", line 28, in poll
    pid, sts = os.waitpid(self.pid, flag)
               ~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-rhel9-s390x.refleak/build/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 566, in handler
    raise RuntimeError('join took too long: %s' % p)
RuntimeError: join took too long: <Process name='Process-4' pid=2254821 parent=2254816 started daemon>

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

bedevere-bot commented Aug 18, 2025

Copy link

Copy Markdown

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot AMD64 CentOS9 NoGIL Refleaks 3.x (tier-1) has failed when building commit bc28724.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/1610/builds/1925) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (bc28724) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/1610/builds/1925

Failed tests:

test_free_threading

Test leaking resources:

test_free_threading: file descriptors

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

Click to see traceback logs

remote: Enumerating objects: 5, done.        
remote: Counting objects:  25% (1/4)        
remote: Counting objects:  50% (2/4)        
remote: Counting objects:  75% (3/4)        
remote: Counting objects: 100% (4/4)        
remote: Counting objects: 100% (4/4), done.        
remote: Compressing objects:  50% (1/2)        
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2/2)        
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done.        
remote: Total 5 (delta 2), reused 2 (delta 2), pack-reused 1 (from 1)        
From https://github.com/python/cpython
 * branch                    main       -> FETCH_HEAD
Note: switching to 'bc2872445b2aee4bb4e001d4171489d7123b1daf'.

You are in 'detached HEAD' state. You can look around, make experimental
changes and commit them, and you can discard any commits you make in this
state without impacting any branches by switching back to a branch.

If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create, you may
do so (now or later) by using -c with the switch command. Example:

  git switch -c <new-branch-name>

Or undo this operation with:

  git switch -

Turn off this advice by setting config variable advice.detachedHead to false

HEAD is now at bc2872445b2 gh-127146: Emscripten: Add test_sample_profiler skips where needed (#137815)
Switched to and reset branch 'main'

configure: WARNING: no system libmpdec found; falling back to pure-Python version for the decimal module

make: *** [Makefile:2486: buildbottest] Error 2

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Agent-Hellboy pushed a commit to Agent-Hellboy/cpython that referenced this pull request

Aug 19, 2025


          pythongh-127146: Emscripten: Add test_sample_profiler skips where nee…

…ded (python#137815)

Emscripten doesn't have the `socket.SO_REUSEADDR` constant; skip tests that
require that symbol to exist.

Reviewers

freakboy3742

freakboy3742 approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

OS-emscripten skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.

GeezerVison

Conversation

hoodmane commented Aug 15, 2025 • edited by bedevere-app Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

freakboy3742 commented Aug 17, 2025

Uh oh!

bedevere-bot commented Aug 17, 2025

Uh oh!

freakboy3742 commented Aug 17, 2025

Uh oh!

freakboy3742 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

bedevere-bot commented Aug 18, 2025

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Uh oh!

bedevere-bot commented Aug 18, 2025

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Uh oh!

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

hoodmane commented Aug 15, 2025 •

edited by bedevere-app Bot

Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.