GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-130317: Fix SNaN broken tests on HP PA RISC by stefanor · Pull Request #140452 · python/cpython Conversation
|
|
FYI: @thesamesam |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
CC @vstinner |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, minor nitpicks
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
While looking at pythonGH-140028, I found some unrelated test regressions in the 3.14 cycle. These seem to all come from pythonGH-130317. From what I can tell, that made Python more correct than it was before. According to [0], HP PA RISC uses 1 for SNaN and thus a 0 for QNaN. [0]: https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/email/msg03272.html (cherry picked from commit 76fea55) Co-authored-by: Stefano Rivera <[email protected]>
|
GH-140467 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Merged, thanks. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…40467) gh-130317: Fix SNaN broken tests on HP PA RISC (GH-140452) While looking at GH-140028, I found some unrelated test regressions in the 3.14 cycle. These seem to all come from GH-130317. From what I can tell, that made Python more correct than it was before. According to [0], HP PA RISC uses 1 for SNaN and thus a 0 for QNaN. [0]: https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/email/msg03272.html (cherry picked from commit 76fea55) Co-authored-by: Stefano Rivera <[email protected]>
While looking at python#140028, I found some unrelated test regressions in the 3.14 cycle. These seem to all come from python#130317. From what I can tell, that made Python more correct than it was before. According to [0], HP PA RISC uses 1 for SNaN and thus a 0 for QNaN. [0]: https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/email/msg03272.html
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.