GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-140544: cleanup `HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL` checks in pystate.c by kumaraditya303 · Pull Request #140547 · python/cpython

Conversation

@kumaraditya303

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 commented Oct 24, 2025 •
edited by bedevere-app Bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In preparation for storing interpreter state as thread-local variable.

The GIL state functions such as gilstate_get already access _Py_tss_gilstate unconditionally so rather than adding this check everywhere, it is added in the beginning of the file now.

  • Issue: Store current interpreter as a thread local variable #140544

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@kumaraditya303
cleanup HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL checks
2093961
@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 added the skip news label Oct 24, 2025
@kumaraditya303
kumaraditya303 requested review from ZeroIntensity and ericsnowcurrently as code owners October 24, 2025 13:31
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2025
Store current interpreter as a thread local variable #140544
Closed
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the awaiting core review label Oct 24, 2025
corona10
corona10 approved these changes Oct 24, 2025
View reviewed changes
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting core review labels Oct 24, 2025
ZeroIntensity
ZeroIntensity approved these changes Oct 24, 2025
View reviewed changes

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a little worried about the rationale expressed in the issue, but I think we should do this anyway.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

corona10 and colesbury reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 2 reactions
@corona10

corona10 commented Oct 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I'm a little worried about the rationale expressed in the issue, but I think we should do this anyway.

Yeah, I feel the same way.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@kumaraditya303

kumaraditya303 commented Oct 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I'm a little worried about the rationale expressed in the issue, but I think we should do this anyway.

Yeah, this cleanup is orthogonal to the issue but still seems good to clean this up a bit.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@kumaraditya303
kumaraditya303 enabled auto-merge (squash) October 24, 2025 13:53
@kumaraditya303
kumaraditya303 merged commit ebf9938 into python:main Oct 24, 2025
4 checks passed

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot removed the awaiting merge label Oct 24, 2025
@kumaraditya303
kumaraditya303 deleted the pystate branch October 24, 2025 14:32
StanFromIreland pushed a commit to StanFromIreland/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2025
@kumaraditya303 @StanFromIreland
pythongh-140544: cleanup HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL checks in pystate.c (pyt…
6f26a4b
…hon#140547)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@corona10 corona10 corona10 approved these changes
@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity approved these changes
@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently Awaiting requested review from ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently is a code owner

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@kumaraditya303 @corona10 @ZeroIntensity
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.