GeezerVison is showing github.com — GH-115802: Remove no-plt for Linux AArch64 by diegorusso · Pull Request #148238 · python/cpython
Conversation
diegorusso
commented
Apr 8, 2026
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Removing -fno-plt makes Linux stencils use more direct call relocations and fewer GOT-indirect call sequences. On AArch64 it means CALL26 instead of adrp/ldr/blr GOT calls
This improves code size and some complexity of the JIT stencils. It reduces the amount of GOT-specific patching the JIT has to do.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
diegorusso
changed the title
GH-115802: Remove no-plt for Linux targets
GH-115802: Remove no-plt for Linux AArch64
Apr 8, 2026
diegorusso
commented
Apr 8, 2026
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
I had to revert the x86-64 changes as they are more involved and require more investigation. I'm going to create a new issue for changing x86-64 Linux target: #148256
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Do you have any numbers for this?
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
diegorusso
commented
Apr 8, 2026
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Do you have any numbers for this?
| Relocation |
Before (-fno-plt) |
After (default) |
Delta |
| R_AARCH64_CALL26 |
0 |
368 |
+368 |
| R_AARCH64_JUMP26 |
269 |
269 |
0 |
| R_AARCH64_ADR_GOT_PAGE |
831 |
461 |
-370 |
| R_AARCH64_LD64_GOT_LO12_NC |
829 |
461 |
-368 |
Before all the calls were done via GOT, now only 55% are done via the GOT and the rest using a direct bl
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Sorry, didn’t have a chance to look at this yet. What happens if the jump is outside the 26 bit range? The trampolines get used? Were the trampolines being used at all before?
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sorry, didn’t have a chance to look at this yet. What happens if the jump is outside the 26 bit range? The trampolines get used? Were the trampolines being used at all before?
Earlier no trampolines were used at all. Now if a jump is out of range, the trampoline is generated.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ljfp
pushed a commit
to ljfp/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2026
Reviewers
brandtbucher
Awaiting requested review from brandtbucher
brandtbucher is a code owner
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|