GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Skip test_highly_nested_objects_decoding during the PGO profile task. by gpshead · Pull Request #151460 · python/cpython Conversation
Member
One line change to disable test_json.test_highly_nested_objects_decoding during PGO training. Since the recursion guard tracks real C-stack bounds (gh-91079), this test asserts that 500k nesting levels overflow the stack margin. On a 64 MiB stack (some Nix build envs use one that large), the optimized interpreter uses ~160 bytes/level (raises at ~420k levels) so the assertion holds with only ~16% margin; the PGO instrumented stage inlines less, its per-level scanner frames are smaller, and the 500k-deep decode completes -- "RecursionError not raised" fails the profile run and aborts We could also keep playing whack a mole and raise the 500k to a much larger number... but there's little value in PGO training on this test anyways.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsSince the recursion guard tracks real C-stack bounds (pythongh-91079), this test asserts that 500k nesting levels overflow the stack margin. On a 64 MiB stack (some Nix build envs use one that large), the optimized interpreter uses ~160 bytes/level (raises at ~420k levels) so the assertion holds with only ~16% margin; the PGO *instrumented* stage inlines less, its per-level scanner frames are smaller, and the 500k-deep decode completes -- "RecursionError not raised" fails the profile run and aborts `make profile-opt`. Upstream's skip_if_unlimited_stack_size (pythongh-143460) only covers RLIM_INFINITY, not large-finite stacks like ours. We could also keep playing whack a mole and raise the 500k to a much larger number... but there's little value in PGO training on this test anyways.
gpshead
enabled auto-merge (squash)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
gpshead
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
…e task. (GH-151460) (#151468) Skip test_highly_nested_objects_decoding during the PGO profile task. (GH-151460) Since the recursion guard tracks real C-stack bounds (gh-91079), this test asserts that 500k nesting levels overflow the stack margin. On a 64 MiB stack (some Nix build envs use one that large), the optimized interpreter uses ~160 bytes/level (raises at ~420k levels) so the assertion holds with only ~16% margin; the PGO *instrumented* stage inlines less, its per-level scanner frames are smaller, and the 500k-deep decode completes -- "RecursionError not raised" fails the profile run and aborts `make profile-opt`. Upstream's skip_if_unlimited_stack_size (gh-143460) only covers RLIM_INFINITY, not large-finite stacks like ours. We could also keep playing whack a mole and raise the 500k to a much larger number... but there's little value in PGO training on this test anyways. (cherry picked from commit e91f68a) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]>
gpshead
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
…e task. (GH-151460) (#151469) Skip test_highly_nested_objects_decoding during the PGO profile task. (GH-151460) Since the recursion guard tracks real C-stack bounds (gh-91079), this test asserts that 500k nesting levels overflow the stack margin. On a 64 MiB stack (some Nix build envs use one that large), the optimized interpreter uses ~160 bytes/level (raises at ~420k levels) so the assertion holds with only ~16% margin; the PGO *instrumented* stage inlines less, its per-level scanner frames are smaller, and the 500k-deep decode completes -- "RecursionError not raised" fails the profile run and aborts `make profile-opt`. Upstream's skip_if_unlimited_stack_size (gh-143460) only covers RLIM_INFINITY, not large-finite stacks like ours. We could also keep playing whack a mole and raise the 500k to a much larger number... but there's little value in PGO training on this test anyways. (cherry picked from commit e91f68a) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]>
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
philthompson10
pushed a commit
to philthompson10/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
…pythonGH-151460) Since the recursion guard tracks real C-stack bounds (pythongh-91079), this test asserts that 500k nesting levels overflow the stack margin. On a 64 MiB stack (some Nix build envs use one that large), the optimized interpreter uses ~160 bytes/level (raises at ~420k levels) so the assertion holds with only ~16% margin; the PGO *instrumented* stage inlines less, its per-level scanner frames are smaller, and the 500k-deep decode completes -- "RecursionError not raised" fails the profile run and aborts `make profile-opt`. Upstream's skip_if_unlimited_stack_size (pythongh-143460) only covers RLIM_INFINITY, not large-finite stacks like ours. We could also keep playing whack a mole and raise the 500k to a much larger number... but there's little value in PGO training on this test anyways.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersNo reviewsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesLabelsProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |