GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-17050: Remove documentation on argparse.REMAINDER by corollari · Pull Request #18661 · python/cpython

Conversation

@corollari

@corollari corollari commented Feb 25, 2020 •
edited by miss-islington
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes Issue 17050 by removing argparse.REMAINDER from the documentation, as discussed on the issue.

https://bugs.python.org/issue17050

Automerge-Triggered-By: @rhettinger

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
pxeger, Jwink3101, fwcd, rindeal, and thisismypassport reacted with thumbs down emoji
All reactions
  • 👎 5 reactions
@corollari
Remove documentation on argparse.REMAINDER
cfbb068
@the-knights-who-say-ni

the-knights-who-say-ni commented Feb 25, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Recognized GitHub username

We couldn't find a bugs.python.org (b.p.o) account corresponding to the following GitHub usernames:

@corollari

This might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in one's b.p.o account settings. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at this contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA not signed label Feb 25, 2020
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels Feb 25, 2020
@corollari

corollari commented Feb 25, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I've already signed the CLA and I'm currently just waiting for it to get accepted.

Regarding the bedevere/news CI failure, I'm a bit confused by it because the docs on news blurbs states that "Changes that affect documentation only generally do not require a news entry.". Is there something I'm missing?
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added CLA signed and removed CLA not signed labels Feb 26, 2020
eamanu
eamanu approved these changes Feb 26, 2020
View reviewed changes

@eamanu eamanu left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting core review and removed awaiting review labels Feb 26, 2020
@eamanu

eamanu commented Feb 26, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@corollari yes you are right, this PR does not need a NEWs.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@csabella
csabella requested a review from rhettinger May 22, 2020 20:05
@rhettinger rhettinger added 🤖 automerge labels May 24, 2020
rhettinger
rhettinger approved these changes May 24, 2020
View reviewed changes
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting core review labels May 24, 2020
@rhettinger rhettinger added the skip news label May 24, 2020
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented May 24, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@corollari: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@miss-islington
miss-islington merged commit 59f5022 into python:master May 24, 2020
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented May 24, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @corollari for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed awaiting merge needs backport to 3.9 labels May 24, 2020
@bedevere-bot

bedevere-bot commented May 24, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-20363 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
rhettinger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2020
@miss-islington
bpo-17050: Remove documentation on argparse.REMAINDER (GH-18661) (GH-…
46c1b9c 
…20363)
@sobolevn sobolevn mentioned this pull request Apr 17, 2023
gh-103582: Remove last references to argparse.REMAINDER from docs #103586
Merged
@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2023
Add nargs='...' to the reference of add_argument in argparse #101472
Open
@mihaic mihaic mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2023
nargs=argparse.REMAINDER can break config file option parsing bw2/ConfigArgParse#285
Closed
@clytaemnestra clytaemnestra mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2026
argparse does not honor default argument for nargs=argparse.REMAINDER argument #79676
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rhettinger rhettinger rhettinger approved these changes
+1 more reviewer
@eamanu eamanu eamanu approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

6 participants

@corollari @the-knights-who-say-ni @eamanu @miss-islington @bedevere-bot @rhettinger
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.