GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Update readme by zware · Pull Request #21 · python/cpython Conversation
Member
This does some modernization and cleanup of the toplevel README. There is still significant room for improvement, but this hits some of the low-hanging fruit. For reviewers, the first commit is the real change, the second commit is a simple rewrap.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Mariatta
reviewed
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. GitHub with capital
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks!
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why this character ' ?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's the possessive form. Maybe a better wording would be "LTO takes advantage of the ability of recent compiler toolchains to optimise..."
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yep, because I have not seen the possessive form, but just a mistake in the text.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, this is significantly less than ideal. Fixing it also showed that there's a typo in "takes advantages".
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
These include spelling/grammar fixes, removing some outdated prose, updating some superceded prose, and adding/cleaning up some links.
[skip ci]
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #21 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 82.38% 82.37% -0.02% ========================================== Files 1428 1427 -1 Lines 351138 350948 -190 ========================================== - Hits 289291 289087 -204 - Misses 61847 61861 +14 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Includes GH-2, pythonGH-70, pythonGH-73, and pythonGH-21.
|
Backport to 3.5 and 2.7? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
21: warn for keys/items/values/range r=ltratt a=nanjekyejoannah I think I was over-thinking the solution with flags at synbol table generation. I found a simple check at the AST that checks correctness of values assigned to wanr for things like "True" and other keywords and used this check to warn for these calls. This warns for `keys/values/items/range`: Accurate when the statement is in an assignment: `x = range(20)` ` y = d.keys()` Co-authored-by: Joannah Nanjekye <[email protected]>
Also full coverage for all supported Pythons.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.