GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.9] bpo-28681: Clarify multiple function names in the tutorial (GH-21340) by miss-islington · Pull Request #21343 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jul 6, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

  • improve control flow docs

  • Add also

Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy [email protected]

Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit d12af71)

Co-authored-by: Joannah Nanjekye [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue28681

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@nanjekyejoannah @miss-islington
bpo-28681: Clarify multiple function names in the tutorial (pythonGH-…
aafa60e 
…21340)

* improve control flow docs

* Add also

Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit d12af71)

Co-authored-by: Joannah Nanjekye <[email protected]>
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label Jul 6, 2020
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2020
bpo-28681: Clarify multiple function names in the tutorial #21340
Merged
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added skip news docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels Jul 6, 2020
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jul 6, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@nanjekyejoannah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@nanjekyejoannah
nanjekyejoannah merged commit 00c09f0 into python:3.9 Jul 6, 2020
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting review label Jul 6, 2020
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-d12af71-3.9 branch July 6, 2020 02:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@miss-islington @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot @nanjekyejoannah
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.