GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-44062: Fix PYTHON_FOR_BUILD interpreter lookup for cross-compile … by vfazio · Pull Request #25951 · python/cpython

Conversation

@vfazio

@vfazio vfazio commented May 6, 2021 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

…builds

Previously, when running configure in a cross-compile scenario, the
PYTHON_FOR_BUILD interpreter could be set to python even if no python
is availble in PATH.

Now, configure will properly set PYTHON_FOR_BUILD based on what is
available in PATH or fail.

https://bugs.python.org/issue44062

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting review label May 6, 2021
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA not signed label May 6, 2021
@the-knights-who-say-ni

the-knights-who-say-ni commented May 6, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

CLA Missing

Our records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA:

@vfazio

For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day
before our records are updated.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added CLA signed and removed CLA not signed labels May 10, 2021
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 10, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Jun 10, 2021
@vfazio
bpo-44062: Fix PYTHON_FOR_BUILD interpreter lookup for cross-compile …
872ef8d 
…builds

Previously, when running configure in a cross-compile scenario, the
PYTHON_FOR_BUILD interpreter could be set to python even if no python
is availble in PATH.

Now, configure will properly set PYTHON_FOR_BUILD based on what is
available in PATH or fail.
@vfazio
vfazio force-pushed the issue44062 branch from 92315cf to 872ef8d Compare June 10, 2021 13:43
@blurb-it
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
3bffb0b
@vfazio vfazio mannequin mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2022
cross: wrong interpreter returned when no python available #88228
Open
@vfazio

vfazio commented Apr 11, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing since #90039 (bpo-45881) was addressed in #29835

#88228 should be closed to reflect this PR being closed.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@vfazio vfazio closed this Apr 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting review stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@vfazio @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.