GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.10] bpo-43475: Fix the Python implementation of hash of Decimal NaN (GH-26679) by miss-islington · Pull Request #26706 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jun 13, 2021 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

(cherry picked from commit 9f1c5f6)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue43475

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@serhiy-storchaka @miss-islington
bpo-43475: Fix the Python implementation of hash of Decimal NaN (pyth…
ed58970 
…onGH-26679)

(cherry picked from commit 9f1c5f6)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
miss-islington requested a review from rhettinger as a code owner June 13, 2021 13:35
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label Jun 13, 2021
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jun 13, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2021
bpo-43475: Fix the Python implementation of hash of Decimal NaN #26679
Merged
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added skip news type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error awaiting review labels Jun 13, 2021
serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka approved these changes Jun 13, 2021
View reviewed changes
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting review labels Jun 13, 2021
@miss-islington
miss-islington merged commit 128899d into python:3.10 Jun 13, 2021
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting merge label Jun 13, 2021
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-9f1c5f6-3.10 branch June 13, 2021 14:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka approved these changes
@rhettinger rhettinger Awaiting requested review from rhettinger rhettinger is a code owner

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip news type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@miss-islington @serhiy-storchaka @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.