GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-46841: Fix error message hacks in `GET_AWAITABLE` by brandtbucher · Pull Request #31664 · python/cpython

Conversation

@brandtbucher

@brandtbucher brandtbucher commented Mar 3, 2022 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The existing code was already quite sensitive to small changes in the compiler, but it is also now technically incorrect (due to the recent addition of inline bytecode caches).

We have all the context we need in the compiler, so a normal oparg can be used as a much simpler mechanism for achieving the same effect.

https://bugs.python.org/issue46841

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
brandtbucher added 3 commits March 3, 2022 12:35
@brandtbucher
Use an oparg to discover context for GET_AWAITABLE
24541ba
@brandtbucher
blurb add
be453c5
@brandtbucher
Fix vertical whitespace
78b90e8
@brandtbucher
brandtbucher requested a review from markshannon as a code owner March 3, 2022 20:42
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting core review label Mar 3, 2022
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label Mar 3, 2022
@brandtbucher brandtbucher mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2022
Inline caching faster-cpython/ideas#310
Closed
21 of 26 tasks
@brandtbucher
Merge branch 'main' into get-awaitable
77ca864
@markshannon

markshannon commented Mar 4, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

👍 to one less hack in the async/await implementation.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@markshannon
markshannon merged commit 586b24d into python:main Mar 4, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting core review label Mar 4, 2022
@brandtbucher brandtbucher mentioned this pull request Mar 4, 2022
bpo-46841: Fix BINARY_OP's handling of inline caches #31671
Merged
@brandtbucher brandtbucher mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2022
Inline bytecode caches #90997
Closed
@brandtbucher
brandtbucher deleted the get-awaitable branch July 21, 2022 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@markshannon markshannon Awaiting requested review from markshannon markshannon is a code owner

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@brandtbucher @markshannon @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.