GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.6] bpo-31320: No traceback to sys.stderr in test_ssl (GH-3360) by miss-islington · Pull Request #3369 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Sep 5, 2017 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In case PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER is used for both client context and server
context, the test thread dies with OSError. Catch OSError to avoid
traceback on sys.stderr

Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 305e56c)

https://bugs.python.org/issue31320

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
gameroman reacted with thumbs up emoji Mariatta, alex, and gameroman reacted with laugh emoji Mariatta and alex reacted with hooray emoji Mariatta, alex, and emmatyping reacted with heart emoji Rosuav and gameroman reacted with eyes emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction
  • 😄 3 reactions
  • 🎉 2 reactions
  • ❤️ 3 reactions
  • 👀 2 reactions
@tiran @miss-islington
[3.6] bpo-31320: No traceback to sys.stderr in test_ssl (pythonGH-3360)
e514ce7 
In case PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER is used for both client context and server
context, the test thread dies with OSError. Catch OSError to avoid
traceback on sys.stderr

Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 305e56c)
@the-knights-who-say-ni

the-knights-who-say-ni commented Sep 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username on bugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA (this might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in your b.p.o account settings). This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA not signed label Sep 5, 2017
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 5, 2017
bpo-31320: No traceback to sys.stderr in test_ssl #3360
Merged
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting review label Sep 5, 2017
@Mariatta Mariatta mentioned this pull request Sep 5, 2017
Bot to automatically generate cherry-picking PRs python/core-workflow#8
Closed
vstinner
vstinner approved these changes Sep 5, 2017
View reviewed changes

@vstinner vstinner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Nice bot :-)

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting review labels Sep 5, 2017
@Mariatta
Mariatta merged commit c506403 into python:3.6 Sep 6, 2017
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-305e56c-3.6 branch September 12, 2017 02:55
@Mariatta Mariatta removed the awaiting merge label Oct 8, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@vstinner vstinner vstinner approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

6 participants

@miss-islington @the-knights-who-say-ni @vstinner @Mariatta @bedevere-bot @tiran
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.