GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-29481: DOC: mark which version typing.Deque added by tacaswell · Pull Request #61 · python/cpython

Conversation

@tacaswell

@tacaswell tacaswell commented Feb 13, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is targeted at 3.6, but half of it should be backported to 3.5.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA not signed label Feb 13, 2017
@the-knights-who-say-ni

the-knights-who-say-ni commented Feb 13, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username on bugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow these steps to help rectify the issue:

  1. If you don't have an account on b.p.o, please create one
  2. Make sure your GitHub username is listed in "Your Details" at b.p.o
  3. If you have not already done so, please sign the PSF contributor agreement
  4. If you just signed the CLA, please wait at least a day and then check "Your Details" on bugs.python.org to see if your account has been marked as having signed the CLA (the delay is due to a person having to manually check your signed CLA)
  5. Reply here saying you have completed the above steps

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@tacaswell
tacaswell changed the base branch from master to 3.6 February 13, 2017 04:01
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Feb 13, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #61 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #61      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.37%   82.37%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1427     1427              
  Lines      350948   350948              
==========================================
+ Hits       289091   289095       +4     
+ Misses      61857    61853       -4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
Lib/heapq.py 96.56% <ø> (-0.77%) ❌
Lib/threading.py 82.6% <ø> (-0.18%) ❌
Lib/test/test_smtplib.py 86.71% <ø> (+0.22%) ✅
Lib/test/test_strptime.py 95.01% <ø> (+0.26%) ✅
Lib/_strptime.py 95.01% <ø> (+0.33%) ✅
Lib/test/test_thread.py 66.83% <ø> (+0.51%) ✅
Lib/test/test_capi.py 92.5% <ø> (+0.55%) ✅

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 649a7ca...5dd1ab0. Read the comment docs.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

berkerpeksag
berkerpeksag requested changes Feb 13, 2017
View reviewed changes

@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've re-targeted this to master branch. We can then backport this to 3.6. For 3.5, we'll need a separate PR that adds .. versionadded:: 3.5.4.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread Doc/library/typing.rst Outdated

@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag Feb 13, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For 3.6 docs, we can remove .. versionadded:: 3.5.4.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@berkerpeksag
berkerpeksag changed the base branch from 3.6 to master February 13, 2017 11:26
@tacaswell

tacaswell commented Feb 13, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Should the 3.5 one also target master?

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@tacaswell
DOC: mark which version typing.Deque added
5dd1ab0
@tacaswell
tacaswell force-pushed the doc_deque_vadded branch from 86b0fa5 to 5dd1ab0 Compare February 13, 2017 13:23
@tacaswell

tacaswell commented Feb 13, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

fixed and force-pushed.

I am currently running the CLA by my employer, it may be faster to just have someone else do this (given how minor it is).

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@berkerpeksag

berkerpeksag commented Feb 13, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Should the 3.5 one also target master?

3.5 should be against 3.5 branch, but don't worry about that :) Core developers can do the 3.5 backport.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@tacaswell

tacaswell commented Feb 15, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing as this can be fixed faster by others than I expect to be able to sign the CLA.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@tacaswell tacaswell closed this Feb 15, 2017
@tacaswell
tacaswell deleted the doc_deque_vadded branch February 15, 2017 13:32
@gvanrossum gvanrossum mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2022
Test issue #47020
Closed
jaraco pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2022
@Mariatta
Add more unittests (GH-61)
acf5c06
jaraco pushed a commit to jaraco/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2023
@warsaw
Backport fix for test isolation from Python 3.8/3.7. Closes python#61
a4f0d6e
jaraco pushed a commit to jaraco/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2023
@warsaw
Merge branch 'issue61' into 'master'
14d8cd8
Backport fix for test isolation from Python 3.8/3.7

Closes python#61

See merge request python-devs/importlib_resources!63
jaraco pushed a commit to jaraco/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2023
@hugovk
Update base URL for PEPs (python#61)
a4f5b76
isidentical pushed a commit to isidentical/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2023
@pablogsal
Merge pull request python#61 from isidentical/solve-conversion-handle
59ec33d
@gvanrossum gvanrossum mentioned this pull request Aug 22, 2023
heap-use-after-free in _PyFunction_LookupByVersion #108253
Closed
@LinanV LinanV mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2023
Objects/typeobject.c: No such file or directory. #111203
Closed
@ngoldbaum ngoldbaum mentioned this pull request Sep 23, 2024
Crash running PyO3 tests with --test-threads=1000 #124375
Closed
This was referenced Feb 11, 2025
segmentfault when pip installing setuptools #129992
Closed
segmentfault when pip installing setuptools #129993
Closed
AA-Turner pushed a commit to AA-Turner/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
@davepeck
Fix for segv in _PyInterpolation_FromStackRefSteal (python#61)
e6d01ef
@sergey-miryanov sergey-miryanov mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2025
Observed memory leak in ssl library: Python 3.14 GC issue #142516
Closed
@ngoldbaum ngoldbaum mentioned this pull request Mar 6, 2026
Remove deprecated and undocumented function ctypes.SetPointerType #133866
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag berkerpeksag requested changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@tacaswell @the-knights-who-say-ni @berkerpeksag
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.