GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — GH-90699: fix ref counting of static immortal strings by kumaraditya303 · Pull Request #94850 · python/cpython Conversation
|
|
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @kumaraditya303 for commit f530250 🤖 If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Thanks for the work, Would you like to provide a reproducible way for detecting leaks? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The following script causes negative ref count: for i in range(1000): a = repr(False) Output: @kumaraditya303 ➜ /workspaces/cpython (main ✗) $ ./python -X showrefcount main.py [-1001 refs, 0 blocks] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
@corona10: The following script causes negative refcount with # main.py from io import TextIOWrapper a = TextIOWrapper(open('main.py','rb')) for i in a: pass a.close() Output: @kumaraditya303 ➜ /workspaces/cpython (main ✗) $ ./python -X showrefcount main.py [-2 refs, 0 blocks] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
I reproduced the issue with the attached scripts and issues are solved by @kumaraditya303 's patch :)
Thanks for the work!
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry Kumar, Looks like leaks exist through this patch.
PTAL
beginning 6 repetitions
123456
......
test_io leaked [2, 2, 2] references, sum=6
test_io failed (reference leak) in 3 min 23 sec
== Tests result: FAILURE ==
1 test failed:
test_io
Total duration: 3 min 23 sec
Tests result: FAILURE
Raised RLIMIT_NOFILE: 256 -> 1024
0:00:00 load avg: 2.90 Run tests sequentially
0:00:00 load avg: 2.90 [1/1] test_io
beginning 6 repetitions
123456
......
test_io passed in 3 min 23 sec
== Tests result: SUCCESS ==
1 test OK.
Total duration: 3 min 23 sec
Tests result: SUCCESS
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Looking, I wonder why only two bots failed if there are refleaks. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Yeah, I am also able to reproduce, bisecting which one is causing leak |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
I am getting refleak on main branch too, |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Refleak was fixed by #94858 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @kumaraditya303 for commit 0a76abd 🤖 If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Refleak buildbots are failing on main too, see #94979 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thank you, Kumar!
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Thanks @kumaraditya303 for the PR, and @corona10 for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…-94850) (cherry picked from commit 1834133) Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <[email protected]>
|
GH-95037 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Thanks for the review @corona10! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
(cherry picked from commit 1834133) Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <[email protected]>
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.