GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Add typing.TypeVarTuple, Unpack, assert_type by JelleZijlstra · Pull Request #7501 · python/typeshed

Conversation

@JelleZijlstra

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra commented Mar 17, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

python/cpython#31021 and python/cpython#30843.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@JelleZijlstra
Add typing.TypeVarTuple, Unpack, assert_type
80b5f3a
python/cpython#31021 and python/cpython#30843.
JelleZijlstra
JelleZijlstra commented Mar 17, 2022
View reviewed changes
Comment thread stdlib/typing.pyi
Unpack: _SpecialForm

class TypeVarTuple:
__name__: str

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra Mar 17, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Anticipating python/cpython#31954.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood Mar 17, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we wait until that's merged before merging this, or do you reckon we're good to go?

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra Mar 17, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better to wait I think.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

AlexWaygood reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood Mar 17, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Converting this to a draft for now so it doesn't get accidentally merged in the meantime)

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra Mar 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I merged the CPython change

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood Mar 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And I merged this one :)

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Mar 17, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood added the implementation-pending label Mar 17, 2022
@AlexWaygood
AlexWaygood marked this pull request as draft March 17, 2022 05:51
@JelleZijlstra
JelleZijlstra marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2022 17:57
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood removed the implementation-pending label Mar 18, 2022
@AlexWaygood
AlexWaygood merged commit 4d23919 into master Mar 18, 2022
@AlexWaygood
AlexWaygood deleted the JelleZijlstra-patch-1 branch March 18, 2022 18:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood AlexWaygood left review comments

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@JelleZijlstra @AlexWaygood
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.