GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — API updates Oct and Nov by jh0ker · Pull Request #127 · python-telegram-bot/python-telegram-bot

Conversation

@jh0ker

@jh0ker jh0ker commented Dec 16, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The class GroupChat has been refactored to Chat and now represents all chats. Also, Message now contains the optional fields supergroup_chat_created, migrate_to_chat_id, migrate_from_chat_id and channel_chat_created.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@jh0ker
API updates Oct and Nov
6e15804
@jh0ker jh0ker mentioned this pull request Dec 16, 2015
API updates: 8th Oct, 2015 #77
Closed
jh0ker added 3 commits December 16, 2015 16:18
@jh0ker
fix docstrings for sphinx
e0233a5
@jh0ker
update sphinx docs
cb0736f
@jh0ker
Release v3.1
0e78606
jh0ker added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2015
@jh0ker
Merge pull request #127 from python-telegram-bot/chatclass
37271e4 
API updates Oct and Nov
@jh0ker
jh0ker merged commit 37271e4 into master Dec 16, 2015
@jh0ker
jh0ker deleted the chatclass branch December 29, 2015 13:34
@leandrotoledo

leandrotoledo commented Jan 4, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Suggestion: Eventually we could have a ChatType class, listing off all the types, as we do in ChatAction.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@jh0ker

jh0ker commented Jan 4, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@leandrotoledo I thought about that, but at the time of implementation, there was no use for that. There was no situation where you would assign the chat type, you'd only decode from json
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This was referenced Jan 9, 2018
Webhook broken pipe results in dispatcher stopping #969
Closed
Webhook Broken Pipe after connection reset, kills dispatcher #970
Closed
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 25, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@jh0ker @leandrotoledo
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.