GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — GitHub - yoheinakajima/agent-runtime-laws: Executable laws and counterexamples for replay, confluence, and fork safety in event-sourced agent runtimes

BranchesTags
Open more actions menu

Latest commit

 

History

5 Commits
5 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
.github/workflows
.github/workflows
 
 
apps/AgentRuntimeLaws.Cli
apps/AgentRuntimeLaws.Cli
 
 
conformance
conformance
 
 
docs
docs
 
 
evidence
evidence
 
 
output/pdf
output/pdf
 
 
paper
paper
 
 
reviews
reviews
 
 
scripts
scripts
 
 
src/AgentRuntimeLaws
src/AgentRuntimeLaws
 
 
tests
tests
 
 
.gitattributes
.gitattributes
 
 
.gitignore
.gitignore
 
 
AgentRuntimeLaws.sln
AgentRuntimeLaws.sln
 
 
EVIDENCE.md
EVIDENCE.md
 
 
FINDINGS.md
FINDINGS.md
 
 
LICENSE
LICENSE
 
 
PAPER_OUTLINE.md
PAPER_OUTLINE.md
 
 
README.md
README.md
 
 
global.json
global.json
 
 

Repository files navigation

Agent Runtime Laws

An executable specification for replay, confluence, and fork safety in event-sourced agent runtimes.

This project asks a narrower question than “what is the smallest agent runtime?” The reducer shape is already well known from Mealy machines, the Elm architecture, and the event-sourcing Decider pattern. The open problem is:

Under which observable conditions are deterministic replay, cheap forking, and end-to-end lineage sound claims?

The companion paper’s working title is “Replay Is a Family of Assertions: Fork-Safety in Event-Sourced Agent Runtimes.” The artifact is written in F# as an executable specification. FsCheck explores generated logs and schedules; named counterexamples are retained as regression fixtures.

Current result

The general settlement loop is neither terminating nor confluent without additional conditions.

  • A cyclic behavior set diverges and must not be reported as quiescent.
  • Two behaviors that write the same state region can reach different quiescent states under different activation schedules.
  • Isolated, pairwise-disjoint writers converge for the deliberately restricted generated family under all four schedulers.
  • Declared writes alone are not a general restoring condition: a preserved counterexample has disjoint writes but schedule-sensitive reads and emitted triggers. A minimal non-interference condition remains open.

Fork safety is property-relative:

  • Retained-prefix projection is exact by construction.
  • Strict execution replay additionally requires captured effect results and a cut that does not split a request from its outcome.
  • External continuation inherits committed one-shot effects and must not execute them again.
  • A committed recorded result with unknown footprint is Conditional rather than automatically refused; it can be served without a live call, but cannot license a world-state claim until its footprint is resolved.
  • A branch that discards an irreversible effect is not a counterfactual world in which that effect never happened.

That last distinction is the central seam: a discarded suffix is irrelevant to trace replay, but not necessarily to the already-mutated external world.

Kernel

The kernel separates four concerns:

  1. Event projection: pure evolve and project functions.
  2. Reactive settlement: behaviors plus an explicit, permutable scheduler.
  3. Fork assessment: soundness relative to a named observation or world claim.
  4. Replay grade: evidence in the log determines which questions it licenses.

Effects are not classified by one flat enum. Three orthogonal dimensions are recorded:

Dimension Values Question answered
External footprint pure, idempotent, compensatable, one-shot, unknown What happened to the world?
Replay source deterministic, recorded, uncaptured Can replay reproduce or serve the result?
Lifecycle requested, committed, failed, unknown Is the effect boundary complete?

The kernel never performs an effect. Interpreters remain outside the artifact.

The transition and settlement boundary is intentionally separated from fork, grade, validation, and conformance analyzers. Readability and explicit lifecycle integrity take priority over a line-count claim.

Replay grades

The five grades form an ordered chain:

observed → envelope → boundary → checkpointed → native

Each grade licenses a larger class of questions. The grade is computed from log evidence and effect completeness; it is not a user-supplied label. Grades are intentionally not monotone under log extension: a later hazard can downgrade a previously clean prefix.

Run it

Requires .NET SDK 8.0.423 or a compatible 8.0 patch.

dotnet restore AgentRuntimeLaws.sln
dotnet build AgentRuntimeLaws.sln --no-restore
dotnet test tests/AgentRuntimeLaws.Properties/AgentRuntimeLaws.Properties.fsproj \
  --no-build --no-restore

dotnet run --project apps/AgentRuntimeLaws.Cli -- demo
dotnet run --project apps/AgentRuntimeLaws.Cli -- \
  conformance conformance/vectors/v1.json
dotnet run --project apps/AgentRuntimeLaws.Cli -- \
  manifest evidence/manifest.json

Or run the complete local gate:

./scripts/verify.sh

Layout

  • src/AgentRuntimeLaws — the readable kernel and validation adapters
  • tests/AgentRuntimeLaws.Properties — FsCheck properties and named regressions
  • tests/fixtures — preserved counterexamples
  • conformance/vectors — language-neutral JSON vectors
  • conformance/schema — machine-readable JSON Schema for those vectors
  • evidence — hash-bound sanitized harness fixtures and provenance notes
  • apps/AgentRuntimeLaws.Cli — demo, conformance, and validation commands
  • FINDINGS.md — the living record of failed properties and restoring conditions
  • docs/RELATED_WORK.md — explicit novelty boundary
  • reviews/2026-08-28 — first multi-model and Explore Science review round
  • reviews/2026-08-29 — second Explore Science review and disposition ledger

Evidence status

The public Synthetic Players capsule was verified and all 5,540 store runs were checked at every cut. Its public verifier covers 4,919 of those runs; the exact reconciliation is 4,919 verifier-covered, 586 other completed runs, and 35 incomplete runs. The 121 observed forks have zero structural mismatches across 16,625 retained-prefix events after excluding child run identity and the store's database-global events.seq. The public activegraph-bridge v0.2.0 release records an actual fork after a committed recorded fixture-oracle effect. Its generator observes one source call and no second fixture-oracle call in the child; its verifier checks receipt/log consistency and a fork-bound caller assertion under a public conformance key. No private trace payloads were copied into this repository. See EVIDENCE.md for exact revisions, hashes, counts, commands, and limitations.

Scope

This artifact does not claim:

  • a new irreducible reducer primitive;
  • mechanized proof;
  • type safety or termination of agent composition;
  • information-flow noninterference;
  • capability confinement;
  • performance results.

The intended contribution is executable contracts, honest counterexamples, and validation against deployed-runtime traces. A passing property suite is evidence over its generators and fixtures, not a universal proof.

Status

Research v0. Kernel contracts, 50 tests, conformance vectors, and deployed-trace validation are implemented. Claude, Gemini, Grok, and a later independent Codex review are archived with provenance and dispositions; two subsequent Explore Science rounds are preserved separately. The public post-oracle conformance mechanism test is complete under the bounded claim stated above. The owner excluded the unpublished local executive study from the submission and authorized the public release and submission workflow on 2026-08-28. The immutable arxiv-v1 tag remains the first public freeze; the 2026-08-29 review round is incorporated and release-verified as a separate successor submission candidate.

About

Executable laws and counterexamples for replay, confluence, and fork safety in event-sourced agent runtimes

Resources

Readme
MIT license
Activity

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

0 forks
Report repository

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.