GeezerVison is showing mathworld.wolfram.com — Normal Number -- from Wolfram MathWorld
Normal Number
A normal number to an integer base is an irrational
number for which every finite block of digits occurs with limiting frequency
in its base- expansion, for every positive
integer . For example, for a normal decimal number, each digit 0-9 occurs with frequency , each pair of digits 00-99
with frequency , etc. A number that is normal
in base is often called -normal.
A number is said to be simply normal to base if its base- expansion has each digit appearing
with average frequency tending to .
A number that is -normal
for every , 3, ... is said to be absolutely
normal (Bailey and Crandall 2002).
As stated by Kac (1959), "As is often the case, it is much easier to prove that an overwhelming majority of objects possess a certain property than to exhibit
even one such object....It is quite difficult to exhibit a 'normal' number!"
(Stoneham 1970).
If a real number is -normal, then it is also -normal for positive integers and (Kuipers and Niederreiter 1974, p. 72; Bailey and Crandall
2001). Furthermore, if
and
are rational with and is -normal, then so is , while if is an integer with , then is also -normal (Kuipers and Niederreiter 1974, p. 77; Bailey
and Crandall 2001).
Determining if numbers are normal is an unresolved problem. It is not even known if fundamental mathematical constants
such as pi (Wagon 1985, Bailey and Crandall 2002), the natural logarithm of 2 (Bailey and Crandall 2002), Apéry's
constant
(Bailey and Crandall 2002), Pythagoras's constant (Bailey and Crandall 2002), and
e are normal, although the first 30 million digits
of have approximately equal digit
frequencies (Bailey 1988).
Tests of
for
(Pythagoras's constant digits), 3 (Theodorus's constant digits), 5, 6, 7,
8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 indicate that these square roots
may be normal (Beyer et al. 1970ab), but such tests do not prove normality.
Isaac (2005) submitted a preprint claiming simple normality to base
2 for
when
is not a square number. The author acknowledged
an incorrect lemma in the original argument and supplied an alternative argument
in a September 2006 revision.
Stephan (2026) proved that Condition (TU), the tail-invariance assertion used in Isaac's proposed proof, is false. The counterexample
concerns the supremum limit of the relative frequency
of binary digits equal to 1 in square
roots of numbers whose binary expansions differ in only finitely many places.
It invalidates that proposed route to simple normality, not the normality conjecture
itself. Simple normality of to base 2 remains open. Stephan
(2026) supplies a Lean formalization of the elementary proof
using only standard logical axioms.
While Borel (1909) proved the normality of almost all numbers with respect to Lebesgue measure, with the exception of a number
of special classes of constants (e.g., Stoneham 1973,
Korobov 1990, Bailey and Crandall 2002), the only numbers known to be normal (in
certain bases) are artificially constructed ones such as the Champernowne
constant and the Copeland-Erdős constant.
In particular, the binary Champernowne
constant
 |
(1)
|
(OEIS A030190) is 2-normal (Bailey and Crandall
2001).
Disjunctivity is weaker than normality: a base- expansion is disjunctive if every finite base- digit word occurs at least once
(Leśniak 2014). The reciprocal Fermat
constant is the subject of an AI-generated result claiming that it is disjunctive
but not normal in base 2 (CaptainSude 2026, VibeMathed 2026).
Bailey and Crandall (2001) showed that, subject to an unproven but reasonable hypothesis related to generators of pseudorandom numbers,
the constants , , and would be 2-normal, where is Apéry's constant.
Stoneham (1973) proved that the so-called Stoneham
numbers
 |
(2)
|
where
are relatively prime positive
integers, are -normal
whenever
is an odd prime and is a primitive root of . This result was extended by Bailey and Crandall
(2002), who showed that
is -normal for all positive
integers
provided only that
and
are relatively prime.
Korobov (1990) showed that the constants
 |
(3)
|
are -normal
for positive integers and and relatively prime, a result
reproved using completely different techniques by Bailey and Crandall (2002). Amazingly,
Korobov (1990) also gave an explicit algorithm for computing terms in the continued
fraction of .
Bailey and Crandall (2002) also established -normality for constants of the
form
for certain sequences of integers and .
See alsoAbsolutely Normal, b-Dense Number, Binary Champernowne Constant,
Champernowne Constant, Copeland-Erdős
Constant, e, Equidistributed
Sequence, Pi, Reciprocal
Fermat Constant, Stoneham Number, Strongly
Normal Number
Explore with Wolfram|Alpha
ReferencesBailey, D. H. "The Computation of to Decimal Digits Using Borweins' Quartically Convergent
Algorithm." Math. Comput. 50, 283-296, 1988.Bailey,
D. H. and Crandall, R. E. "On the Random Character of Fundamental
Constant Expansions." Exper. Math. 10, 175-190, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2001.10504441.Bailey,
D. H. and Crandall, R. E. "Random Generators and Normal Numbers."
Exper. Math. 11, 527-546, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2002.10504704.Beyer,
W. A.; Metropolis, N.; and Neergaard, J. R. "Square Roots of Integers
2 to 15 in Various Bases 2 to 10: 88062 Binary Digits or Equivalent." Math.
Comput. 23, 679, 1969.Beyer, W. A.; Metropolis, N.;
and Neergaard, J. R. "Statistical Study of Digits of Some Square Roots
of Integers in Various Bases." Math. Comput. 24, 455-473, 1970a.Beyer,
W. A.; Metropolis, N.; and Neergaard, J. R. "The Generalized Serial
Test Applied to Expansions of Some Irrational Square Roots in Various Bases."
Math. Comput. 24, 745-747, 1970b.Borel, É. "Les
probabilités dénombrables et leurs applications arithmétiques."
Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 27, 247-271, 1909.CaptainSude.
"The Reciprocal Fermat Constant Is Nonnormal." Sep. 8, 2026. https://github.com/CaptainSude/reciprocal-Fermat-constant-Nonnormal/releases/tag/v1.0.0.Champernowne,
D. G. "The Construction of Decimals Normal in the Scale of Ten." J.
London Math. Soc. 8, 254-260, 1933.Copeland, A. H. and
Erdős, P. "Note on Normal Numbers." Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 52,
857-860, 1946.Gibbs, W. W. "A Digital Slice of Pi. The New
Way to Do Pure Math: Experimentally." Sci. Amer. 288, 23-24, May
2003.Good, I. "Normal Recurring Decimals." J. London Math.
Soc. 21, 167-169, 1946.Good, I. J. and Gover, T. N.
"The Generalized Serial Test and the Binary Expansion of ." J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 130,
102-107, 1967.Good, I. J. and Gover, T. N. "Corrigendum."
J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 131, 434, 1968.Isaac, R.
"On the Simple Normality to Base 2 of , for Not a Perfect Square." 16 Dec 2005. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0512404.Kac,
M. Statistical
Independence in Probability, Analysis and Number Theory. Washington, DC:
Math. Assoc. Amer., 1959.Korobov, N. "Continued Fractions of Certain
Normal Numbers." Math. Zametki 47, 28-33, 1990. English translation
in Math. Notes Acad. Sci. USSR 47, 128-132, 1990.Kuipers,
L. and Niederreiter, H. Uniform
Distribution of Sequences. New York: Wiley, 1974.Leśniak,
K. "On Discrete Stochastic Processes with Disjunctive Outcomes." Bull.
Austral. Math. Soc. 90, 149-159, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972714000124.Postnikov,
A. G. "Ergodic Problems in the Theory of Congruences and of Diophantine
Approximations." Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 82, 1966.Sloane,
N. J. A. Sequence A030190 in "The
On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences."Stephan, R. "Isaac's
Condition (TU) Is False." 15 Oct 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21899.Stoneham,
R. "A General Arithmetic Construction of Transcendental Non-Liouville Normal
Numbers from Rational Functions." Acta Arith. 16, 239-254, 1970.
https://doi.org/10.4064/aa-16-3-239-254.Stoneham,
R. "On Absolute -Normality
in the Rational Fractions with Applications to Normal Numbers." Acta Arith. 22,
277-286, 1973. https://doi.org/10.4064/aa-22-3-277-286.VibeMathed.
"Reciprocal Fermat Constant Is Nonnormal." Sep. 8, 2026. https://vibemathed.com/problem/reciprocal-fermat-constant-is-nonnormal.Wagon,
S. "Is
Normal?" Math. Intel. 7, 65-67, 1985.Weisstein, E. W.
"Bailey and Crandall Discover a New Class of Normal Numbers." MathWorld
Headline News, Oct. 4, 2001. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/news/2001-10-04/normal/.Wells,
D. The
Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers. Middlesex, England:
Penguin Books, p. 26, 1986.Referenced on Wolfram|AlphaNormal Number
Cite this as:
Weisstein, Eric W. "Normal Number." From
MathWorld--A Wolfram Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalNumber.html
Subject classifications
|