GeezerVison is showing github.com — Support HTTP persistent connections in Web Cmdlets by stevenebutler · Pull Request #19249 · PowerShell/PowerShell
Conversation
stevenebutler
commented
Mar 1, 2023
•
edited by iSazonov
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
PR Summary
Fis #12764
This PR addresses 12764 by using persistent HTTP connections when Invoke-WebRequest uses the -Session variable. It does this by
- Tracking the HttpClient object in the saved WebRequestSession.
- Monitoring properties in WebRequestSession and rebuilding the HttpClient if they are changed. This is done to ensure that existing scripts that might tweak parameters between invocations of IWR actually apply the changes so they will behave in a backwards compatible manner. When anything that impacts the HttpClient is changed, the persistent connection is abandoned by disposing the HttpClient and underlying HttpClientHandler and constructing a new one. A warning is logged when this occurs as it has a performance impact (though no worse than the existing behaviour).
- To support point 2, many parameters are stored as internal set-only properties in the WebRequestSession so changes between invocations that would require a new connection can be detected and the handler rebuilt appropriately.
PR Context
This PR makes a considerable difference to performance when using Invoke-WebRequest or Invoke-RestMethod with sessions when multiple requests are made to the same host. This is particularly evident for HTTPS requests, as each HTTPS connection can take hundreds of milliseconds to establish.
This PR as written passes existing tests in WebCmdlets.Tests.ps1 and additional WebSession tests that verify the HttpClient is rebuilt when appropriate.
The PR provides as much backwards compatibility as possible at the expense of the complexity of tracking how the HttpClient used in the WebSession was constructed and recreating the HttpClient in the case it would have been constructed differently between invocations in scripts that assume it is okay to change parameters between invocations with the same WebSession.
This PR squashes the commits in the original PR#19173 following multiple round of reviews by Ilya (@iSazonov) and CarloToso on a previous version of the PR. PR#19173 has been withdrawn due to number of commits and volume of review comments.
Performance Impact
Performance impact of maintaining HTTP connection persistence is measured by comparing PowerShell 7.3.3 with this PR using this simple script:
(Measure-Command {
$null =Invoke-WebRequest https://postman-echo.com/get?i=1 -SessionVariable Session
1..10 | ForEach-Object {
$null =Invoke-WebRequest https://postman-echo.com/get?i=$_ -WebSession $Session
}
}).ToString()
PowerShell 7.3.3
00:00:08.3019013
PR Branch
00:00:03.4589770
PR Checklist
- PR has a meaningful title
- Use the present tense and imperative mood when describing your changes
- Summarized changes
- Make sure all
.h, .cpp, .cs, .ps1 and .psm1 files have the correct copyright header
- This PR is ready to merge and is not Work in Progress.
- If the PR is work in progress, please add the prefix
WIP: or [ WIP ] to the beginning of the title (the WIP bot will keep its status check at Pending while the prefix is present) and remove the prefix when the PR is ready.
- Breaking changes
- User-facing changes
- Testing - New and feature
- Tooling
- I have considered the user experience from a tooling perspective and don't believe tooling will be impacted.
- OR
- I have considered the user experience from a tooling perspective and opened an issue in the relevant tool repository. This may include:
- Impact on PowerShell Editor Services which is used in the PowerShell extension for VSCode
(which runs in a different PS Host).
- Impact on Completions (both in the console and in editors) - one of PowerShell's most powerful features.
- Impact on PSScriptAnalyzer (which provides linting & formatting in the editor extensions).
- Impact on EditorSyntax (which provides syntax highlighting with in VSCode, GitHub, and many other editors).
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
CarloToso and Greg-Smulko reacted with thumbs up emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Codefactor is complaining about some tests that were not added by this PR using plain text as a password.
CarloToso will that impact being able to merge this PR?
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Use persistent HTTP connections when Invoke-WebRequest uses the -Session variable.
This is achieved by
* tracking the HttpClient object in the saved WebRequestSession
* monitoring properties in WebRequestSession and rebuilding the
HttpClient if they are changed. This is done to ensure that
existing scripts that might change parameters between invocations
of IWR actually apply the changes so they will behave in a backwards
compatible manner. When anything that impacts the HttpClient is
changed, the persistent connection is abandoned by disposing the
HttpClient and underlying HttpClientHandler and constructing a new
one. A verbose message is logged when this occurs as it has a
performance impact (though no worse than the existing behaviour).
* To support the point 2 above, many switches were added as internal
set-only properties to the WebRequestSession so changes between
invocations can be detected and the handler rebuilt appropriately.

This PR has 305 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!
Quantification details
Label : Large
Size : +255 -50
Percentile : 70.5%
Total files changed: 5
Change summary by file extension:
.cs : +141 -50
.resx : +3 -0
.ps1 : +111 -0
Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.
Why proper sizing of changes matters
Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:
- Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
- Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
- Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
- Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.
What can I do to optimize my changes
- Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the
Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your
prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your
prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
- Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
- Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).
How to interpret the change counts in git diff output
- One line was added:
+1 -0
- One line was deleted:
+0 -1
- One line was modified:
+1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
- Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.
Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
I have squashed all commits into a single commit.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
God-damnit-all, CarloToso, iSazonov, and Greg-Smulko reacted with hooray emoji
stevenebutler reacted with heart emoji
All reactions
-
🎉
4 reactions
-
❤️
1 reaction
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
stevenebutler Thank you for your contribution!
I'm happy to see this merged. You can safely close #12764 now.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
🎉v7.4.0-preview.2 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:
Handy links:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
I tested Preview 2 and back to back invocations of Invoke-WebRequest and Invoke-RestMethod are not re-using ports, new ones are created.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
tonyg00 did you use the -SessionVariable and then -WebSession parameter?
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
tonyg00
commented
Mar 15, 2023
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
I did not, I just executed, Invoke-WebRequest -uri which is the most common use case for me of these cmdlets.
What is the correct syntax for this?
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Don't worry, it's a new feature, it's not yet documented.
I think this syntax should work:
Invoke-WebRequest -Uri -SessionVariable session
Invoke-WebRequest -Uri -WebSession $session
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
That is working, Thanks!!
|
CarloToso reacted with thumbs up emoji
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This was referenced Mar 15, 2023
This was referenced Mar 15, 2023
Reviewers
+1 more reviewer
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Labels
CL-General
Indicates that a PR should be marked as a general cmdlet change in the Change Log
Large
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|