GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Test free-threaded Python (but only on Linux) by EliahKagan · Pull Request #2011 · gitpython-developers/GitPython

Conversation

@EliahKagan

@EliahKagan EliahKagan commented Mar 7, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes #2005

See commit messages for details:

  • f1dbe33 describes why this uses the approach of using a different action (rather than @main or @... where ... is an OID) for the 3.13t job, and why that is expressed by splitting the step instead of introducing a new matrix variable.
  • fd78857 describes why this only introduces it for Linux. The reason is not entirely the same as proposed in #2005, since it turns out that testing on other systems--in the way we do so here--works without any special effort.

(As elsewhere, due to #2004, the Cygwin test job should be expected to fail here until #2009 is merged. That is not related to the changes here.)

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@EliahKagan EliahKagan changed the title Test on free-threaded Python on Linux Test free-threaded Python on Linux (but only on Linux) Mar 7, 2025
@EliahKagan EliahKagan changed the title Test free-threaded Python on Linux (but only on Linux) Test free-threaded Python (but only on Linux) Mar 7, 2025
@EliahKagan
EliahKagan marked this pull request as ready for review March 7, 2025 04:02
@EliahKagan EliahKagan mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2025
Should test with free-threaded interpreter on CI #2005
Closed
EliahKagan added 2 commits March 12, 2025 20:28
@EliahKagan @Byron
Test on free-threaded Python
c13d998
See gitpython-developers#2005. Right now, this does not limit by operating system, but
that is just to verify that there are no OS-specific 3.13t problems
we should know about right now; once that is verified, the macOS
and Windows jobs will be removed (excluded) for the time being.

The 3.13t jobs added here use `Quansight-Labs/setup-python`, not
`actions/setup-python`. The latter also has the ability to use
3.13t since actions/python-versions#319
and actions/setup-python#973 (see also
actions/setup-python#771), but no version
tag includes this feature yet. It can be used by using `@main` or
`@...` where `...` is an OID. The former would risk pulling in
other untested features we're no trying to test with, while the
latter would not be easy to upgrade automatically as what we have
now (we would be deliberately keeping a hash not at any tag that is
already not the latest hash on any branch). In contrast, the
`Quansight-Labs/setup-python` fork adds this feature while staying
up to date with others. When `actions/setup-python` has a release
(stable or prerelease) with this feature, we can switch to it.

This could probably be done with less code duplication by using a
matrix variable for the action to use. Instead, the "Set up Python"
step is split in two, with opposite `if` conditions, so that each
is capable of being recognized and upgraded by Dependabot if a new
major version is released (in case this ends up remaining in place
longer than expected).
@EliahKagan @Byron
Only test free-threaded Python on Linux
56038c3
For now, this omits macOS and Windows from the 3.13t ("threaded")
tests.

The plan in gitpython-developers#2005 is to start without them, and no OS-specific
problems have been identified so far. In particular, in the
previous commit that adds 3.13t without excluding any operating
systems, all tests in the macOS job passed as expected, and the
Windows job had the same failure with the same message as in gitpython-developers#1955,
with no XFAIL changed to XPASS (which, if present, would suggest
GC differences meriting further exploration of 3.13t on Windows).
@Byron
Byron force-pushed the nogil branch from fd78857 to 56038c3 Compare March 12, 2025 12:28
@Byron
Byron merged commit 6d09bb6 into gitpython-developers:main Mar 12, 2025
@EliahKagan
EliahKagan deleted the nogil branch March 12, 2025 20:11
EliahKagan added a commit to EliahKagan/GitPython that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2026
@EliahKagan
Test free-threaded interpreter on macOS
17ff9ac
As discussed in gitpython-developers#2005 and gitpython-developers#2011, we had not been doing this before.
Conditions have changed in two relevant ways:

- The free-threaded interpreter has been around longer and it sees
  more use.

- The macOS runners are very fast now.

The specific motivations for doing this now are:

- In view of the condition described in gitpython-developers#2109 and how the change
  there seems to have helped with it, there's some reason to think
  *patch* versions of Python sometimes affect GitPython in ways it
  makes possibly unfounded assumptions about the effect of garbage
  collection. This mainly affects Windows and it is not specific to
  free-threaded builds. However, in principle we could also see
  assumptions violated in tests we think always work on Unix-like
  operating systems, due to differences in how garbage collection
  works in free-threaded interpreters. Therefore, the assumption
  that this only needs to be tested occasionally is not as well
  founded I assumed when I suggested testing it only on GNU/Linux.

- We may add 3.14 jobs to CI soon, and it's useful to be able to
  see how both free-threaded interpreters work on CI, as well as to
  confirm for at least a short while that they are continuing to
  work as expected.

This macOS free-threaded interpreter CI jobs could be disabled once
more if necessary, or if they're found to make CI complete slower
in PRs by even a small amount so long as they don't seem to be
surfacing anything.
EliahKagan added a commit to EliahKagan/GitPython that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2026
@EliahKagan
Test free-threaded interpreter on macOS
9730c9d
As discussed in gitpython-developers#2005 and gitpython-developers#2011, we had not been doing this before.
Conditions have changed in two relevant ways:

- The free-threaded interpreter has been around longer and it sees
  more use.

- The macOS runners are very fast now.

The specific motivations for doing this now are:

- In view of the condition described in gitpython-developers#2109 and how the change
  there seems to have helped with it, there's some reason to think
  *patch* versions of Python sometimes affect GitPython in ways it
  makes possibly unfounded assumptions about the effect of garbage
  collection. This mainly affects Windows and it is not specific to
  free-threaded builds. However, in principle we could also see
  assumptions violated in tests we think always work on Unix-like
  operating systems, due to differences in how garbage collection
  works in free-threaded interpreters. Therefore, the assumption
  that this only needs to be tested occasionally is not as well
  founded I assumed when I suggested testing it only on GNU/Linux.

- We may add 3.14 jobs to CI soon, and it's useful to be able to
  see how both free-threaded interpreters work on CI, as well as to
  confirm for at least a short while that they are continuing to
  work as expected.

This macOS free-threaded interpreter CI jobs could be disabled once
more if necessary, or if they're found to make CI complete slower
in PRs by even a small amount so long as they don't seem to be
surfacing anything.
EliahKagan added a commit to EliahKagan/GitPython that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2026
@EliahKagan
Test free-threaded interpreter on macOS
d1ab2e4
As discussed in gitpython-developers#2005 and gitpython-developers#2011, we had not been doing this before.
Conditions have changed in two relevant ways:

- The free-threaded interpreter has been around longer and it sees
  more use.

- The macOS runners are very fast now.

The specific motivations for doing this now are:

- In view of the condition described in gitpython-developers#2109 and how the change
  there seems to have helped with it, there's some reason to think
  *patch* versions of Python sometimes affect GitPython in ways it
  makes possibly unfounded assumptions about the effect of garbage
  collection. This mainly affects Windows and it is not specific to
  free-threaded builds. However, in principle we could also see
  assumptions violated in tests we think always work on Unix-like
  operating systems, due to differences in how garbage collection
  works in free-threaded interpreters. Therefore, the assumption
  that this only needs to be tested occasionally is not as well
  founded I assumed when I suggested testing it only on GNU/Linux.

- We may add 3.14 jobs to CI soon, and it's useful to be able to
  see how both free-threaded interpreters work on CI, as well as to
  confirm for at least a short while that they are continuing to
  work as expected.

This macOS free-threaded interpreter CI jobs could be disabled once
more if necessary, or if they're found to make CI complete slower
in PRs by even a small amount so long as they don't seem to be
surfacing anything.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should test with free-threaded interpreter on CI

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@EliahKagan @Byron
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.