GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites |
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Skip records in the external-spec pass by CatarinaGamboa · Pull Request #370 · liquid-java/liquidjava Conversation
Collaborator
Fixes #369. ProblemSince #363 (Spoon 11), any Change
With this, record methods are verified: a refinement violation inside a record method is reported (related to #342). Tests
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsFixes #369. Since the Spoon 11 upgrade, records reach visitCtRecord instead of visitCtClass, so ExternalRefinementTypeChecker visited a record's methods with no external target and crashed. It now skips records as it skips classes. TypeChecker.scan also reports elements without a source file instead of failing on their position. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
CatarinaGamboa
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Fixes #342 (regression tests only; no verifier change). At the commit in the issue, `CommandLineLauncher` hard-coded compliance level 8. Java 8 has no records, so JDT parsed the record header as a method and its members as locals and a block; the real method was never in the model. Spoon reports this as a warning in noclasspath mode, so the run printed "Java compilation encountered issues" and then "Correct! Passed Verification." It is already fixed on main by #352 (compliance from the pom), #368 (default level 21, Spoon 11.5.0) and #370 (records in the external-spec pass). Forcing level 11 or 15 still reproduces it; 16 and above report the error. Fixtures, with the spec in its own file as in real projects: - `classes/record_external_spec_error/`: State Refinement Errors in a record's instance and static methods. - `classes/record_external_spec_correct/`: the passing counterpart. Related gaps found while investigating, not fixed here: 1. **A parse problem still ends in "Correct!" with only a warning.** If Spoon's level is lower than the code needs, declarations can disappear silently. `ComplianceLevel` reads only `maven.compiler.release`/`source` properties of the nearest pom that has one, and ignores `<release>`/`<source>` in the maven-compiler-plugin configuration, so a parent property of 1.8 overridden in plugin config makes records vanish again. Options: let that warning block the "Correct!" verdict, and read the compiler-plugin config. 2. **One error hides later ones.** An error in a field initializer or initializer block stops checking of the rest of the class (catch in `visitCtClass`). `visitCtRecord` and `visitCtEnum` have no catch, so an error in a record or enum static initializer reaches `RefinementProcessor.processPackage` and later types in the package go unchecked. Per-member catches like those in `visitCtMethod`/`visitCtConstructor` would fix it. 3. **Test harness:** `TestExamples.matches` throws a NullPointerException on a warning with no position (such as the compilation warning). Validation: `mvn test` passes all 412 tests (251 TestExamples cases). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Regression since the Spoon 11 upgrade: any record crashes the verifierUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |