GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — test: make test-uv-binding-constant JS engine neutral by Trott · Pull Request #24666 · nodejs/node Conversation
Member
The error message validation in test-uv-binding-constant depends on the Checklist
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsThe error message validation in test-uv-binding-constant depends on the JS engine. The text will be different in node-chakracore than in V8-based versions of Node.js. Remove the message validation. Test that it is a TypeError only. We should only validate error messages when we control the contents of that error message (and not even necessarily then, but that is a minimum requirement). V8 and other underlying engines can change the error message at any time and that should not require us to change our tests (as changing tests suggests a semver-major change).
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
richardlau
approved these changes
JungMinu
approved these changes
antsmartian
approved these changes
fhinkel
approved these changes
cjihrig
approved these changes
lpinca
approved these changes
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
The error message validation in test-uv-binding-constant depends on the JS engine. The text will be different in node-chakracore than in V8-based versions of Node.js. Remove the message validation. Test that it is a TypeError only. We should only validate error messages when we control the contents of that error message (and not even necessarily then, but that is a minimum requirement). V8 and other underlying engines can change the error message at any time and that should not require us to change our tests (as changing tests suggests a semver-major change). PR-URL: nodejs#24666 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
The error message validation in test-uv-binding-constant depends on the JS engine. The text will be different in node-chakracore than in V8-based versions of Node.js. Remove the message validation. Test that it is a TypeError only. We should only validate error messages when we control the contents of that error message (and not even necessarily then, but that is a minimum requirement). V8 and other underlying engines can change the error message at any time and that should not require us to change our tests (as changing tests suggests a semver-major change). PR-URL: #24666 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
This was referenced
refack
pushed a commit
to refack/node
that referenced
this pull request
The error message validation in test-uv-binding-constant depends on the JS engine. The text will be different in node-chakracore than in V8-based versions of Node.js. Remove the message validation. Test that it is a TypeError only. We should only validate error messages when we control the contents of that error message (and not even necessarily then, but that is a minimum requirement). V8 and other underlying engines can change the error message at any time and that should not require us to change our tests (as changing tests suggests a semver-major change). PR-URL: nodejs#24666 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
The error message validation in test-uv-binding-constant depends on the JS engine. The text will be different in node-chakracore than in V8-based versions of Node.js. Remove the message validation. Test that it is a TypeError only. We should only validate error messages when we control the contents of that error message (and not even necessarily then, but that is a minimum requirement). V8 and other underlying engines can change the error message at any time and that should not require us to change our tests (as changing tests suggests a semver-major change). PR-URL: #24666 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Merged
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
The error message validation in test-uv-binding-constant depends on the JS engine. The text will be different in node-chakracore than in V8-based versions of Node.js. Remove the message validation. Test that it is a TypeError only. We should only validate error messages when we control the contents of that error message (and not even necessarily then, but that is a minimum requirement). V8 and other underlying engines can change the error message at any time and that should not require us to change our tests (as changing tests suggests a semver-major change). PR-URL: #24666 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers+2 more reviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
author ready
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |