GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — doc: update process.release by schamberg97 · Pull Request #35167 · nodejs/node Conversation
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we're not going to maintain a list of all possible values, then I think we should change the preceding wording here from "Currently the valid values are:" to something like "Valid values may include:" to indicate that the following list is a subset. While "Argon" and others may no longer be supported they are still technically LTS release lines that someone could encounter.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about "Valid values include the LTS Release Codenames (including those that are no longer supported). A non-exhaustive example of these codenames includes:" ?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps the links to Release schedule and Changelogs on Github should also be included?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@schamberg97 That sounds good, feel free to add those 🙂
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll do it, but I am away from computer until midgnight
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We currently have a waiting period of 48 hours before we merge any non-trivial PR anyway, so take your time :)
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the delay, had problems with my personal OSS project that was a bigger priority for me. This should probably be reviewed again, just in case
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, with or without the one suggestion I made.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Landed in 571dff8 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Thanks for the contribution! 🎉 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
`process.release` documentation is out of date. This commit makes it up to date. PR-URL: #35167 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
`process.release` documentation is out of date. This commit makes it up to date. PR-URL: #35167 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
`process.release` documentation is out of date. This commit makes it up to date. PR-URL: #35167 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
`process.release` documentation is out of date. This commit makes it up to date. PR-URL: nodejs#35167 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.