GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — test: add test for exec() known issue by Trott · Pull Request #7375 · nodejs/node

Conversation

@Trott

@Trott Trott commented Jun 22, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX) or vcbuild test nosign (Windows) passes
  • a test and/or benchmark is included
  • the commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test child_process

Description of change

Refs: #7342

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@Trott
test: add test for exec() known issue
ad5b897
Refs: nodejs#7342
@Trott Trott added child_process Issues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Jun 22, 2016
@Trott Trott mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2016
Encoding of child_process.exec.stdout changed from String to Buffer in v6.2.1 #7342
Closed
@Trott

Trott commented Jun 22, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/3057/

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Trott Trott mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2016
Revert "child_process: measure buffer length in bytes" #7377
Closed
2 tasks done
cjihrig
cjihrig reviewed Jun 22, 2016
View reviewed changes
Comment thread test/known_issues/test-child-process-exec-stdout-data-string.js Outdated
const assert = require('assert');
const exec = require('child_process').exec;

const keepAlive = setInterval(() => {}, 9999);

@cjihrig cjihrig Jun 22, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Won't the child process keep the event loop open? Works for me locally without the timer.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@cjihrig

cjihrig commented Jun 22, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM with a couple comments.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Trott
squash: address nits, add test for stderr
d46fe32
@Trott

Trott commented Jun 23, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@cjihrig Nits addressed. Also added a test for stderr. PTAL

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Trott added 2 commits June 22, 2016 22:21
@Trott
squash: fix goofs
8485d17
@Trott
squash: lint
8141cfa
@Trott

Trott commented Jun 23, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

CI again: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/3061/

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@cjihrig

cjihrig commented Jun 23, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Changes LGTM

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@santigimeno

santigimeno commented Jun 23, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2016
@Trott
test: add test for exec() known issue
c964574
PR-URL: nodejs#7375
Refs: nodejs#7342
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
@Trott

Trott commented Jun 24, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Landed in c964574

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Trott Trott closed this Jun 24, 2016
Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2016
@Trott @Fishrock123
test: add test for exec() known issue
044a0be
PR-URL: #7375
Refs: #7342
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2016
Propose v6.3.0 #7441
Merged
Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2016
@Trott @Fishrock123
test: add test for exec() known issue
16aff79
PR-URL: #7375
Refs: #7342
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2016
Propose v6.3.0 (v2) #7550
Merged
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2016
Audit commits not found on v4.x-staging #7661
Closed
@MylesBorins MylesBorins added the lts-watch-v4.x label Jul 11, 2016
@MylesBorins

MylesBorins commented Jul 11, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Trott lts?

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Trott

Trott commented Jul 12, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@thealphanerd If it lands and CI's cleanly, yes.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@MylesBorins MylesBorins added land-on-v4.x and removed lts-watch-v4.x labels Jul 12, 2016
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2016
@Trott Myles Borins
test: add test for exec() known issue
91001cc
PR-URL: #7375
Refs: #7342
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2016
@Trott Myles Borins
test: add test for exec() known issue
5735a3d
PR-URL: #7375
Refs: #7342
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jul 12, 2016
v4.5.0 proposal #7688
Merged
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2016
@Trott Myles Borins
test: add test for exec() known issue
d7d9990
PR-URL: #7375
Refs: #7342
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2016
@Trott Myles Borins
test: add test for exec() known issue
a31d316
PR-URL: #7375
Refs: #7342
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
@Trott
Trott deleted the known-exec branch January 13, 2022 22:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

child_process Issues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@Trott @cjihrig @santigimeno @MylesBorins
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.