GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — 3.11: "Check if generated files are up to date" is failing due to autoconf version · Issue #105455 · python/cpython

3.11: "Check if generated files are up to date" is failing due to autoconf version #105455

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed
Closed
3.11: "Check if generated files are up to date" is failing due to autoconf version#105455
Copy link
Labels
3.11only security fixesonly security fixesbuildThe build process and cross-buildThe build process and cross-buildtype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or errorAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Description

@JelleZijlstra
JelleZijlstra
opened on Jun 7, 2023
Issue body actions

On all 3.11 PRs that touch non-docs files (e.g. #105417), the Check if generated files are up to date check is currently failing on the check grep "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69" configure.

This is because d2340ef, which created 3.11.4, updated configure to be generated by Autoconf 2.71. @pablogsal why was this done? Should we update the build.yml file to check for 2.71 instead of 2.69?

Linked PRs

  • [3.11] gh-105455: Regen configure with GNU Autoconf 2.69 #105467
  • [3.11] gh-105455: Bump to GNU Autoconf v2.71 (#104925) #105469

Activity

  1. JelleZijlstra
    added
    type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or errorAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error
    buildThe build process and cross-buildThe build process and cross-build
    3.11only security fixesonly security fixes
    on Jun 7, 2023
  2. ned-deily commented on Jun 7, 2023

    @ned-deily
    ned-deily
    on Jun 7, 2023
    Member
    More actions

    This is probably a side effect of the most recent PRs for #89886 which probably updated the container used to do autoconf operations. @erlend-aasland

  3. pablogsal commented on Jun 7, 2023

    @pablogsal
    pablogsal
    on Jun 7, 2023
    Member
    More actions

    @pablogsal why was this done?

    The release script runs it by running the autoconf step here:

    https://github.com/python/release-tools/blob/8485d3b4d77a2559cbb3cf2e63dee43070327d50/run_release.py#L414-L429

  4. erlend-aasland commented on Jun 7, 2023

    @erlend-aasland
    erlend-aasland
    on Jun 7, 2023
    Contributor
    More actions

    This is probably a side effect of the most recent PRs for #89886 which probably updated the container used to do autoconf operations. @erlend-aasland

    We did not update the container. We just updated the CI and make to use the 271 tagged container. The release tools should use the correct tag depending on which release it is building.

  5. erlend-aasland commented on Jun 7, 2023

    @erlend-aasland
    erlend-aasland
    on Jun 7, 2023
    Contributor
    More actions

    Either we reset configure using GNU Autoconf 2.69, or we backport the Autoconf 2.71 bump to 3.11. I guess the former is preferred, but the latter creates less churn. I can create PRs for both.

  6. erlend-aasland
    added 3 commits that reference this issue on Jun 7, 2023

    [3.11] pythongh-105455: Regen configure with GNU Autoconf 2.69

    787cba4

    [3.11] pythongh-105455: Bump to GNU Autoconf v2.71 (python#104925)

    2d54f33

    [3.11] gh-105455: Regen configure with GNU Autoconf 2.69 (#105467)

    2ffeb0e
  7. erlend-aasland commented on Jun 7, 2023

    @erlend-aasland
    erlend-aasland
    on Jun 7, 2023
    Contributor
    More actions

    Resolved with:

    • [3.11] gh-105455: Regen configure with GNU Autoconf 2.69 #105467
  8. erlend-aasland
    closed this as completedon Jun 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    3.11only security fixesonly security fixesbuildThe build process and cross-buildThe build process and cross-buildtype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or errorAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.