Description

serhiy-storchaka

opened on Sep 7, 2023

Issue body actions

test_xxtestfuzz emits deprecation warnings about modules sre_compile and sre_constants which always were internal. It should use public non-deprecated API.

$ ./python -Wa -m test -v test_xxtestfuzz
...
test_sample_input_smoke_test (test.test_xxtestfuzz.TestFuzzer.test_sample_input_smoke_test)
This is only a regression test: Check that it doesn't crash. ... /home/serhiy/py/cpython/Lib/test/test_xxtestfuzz.py:13: DeprecationWarning: module 'sre_compile' is deprecated
  _xxtestfuzz.run(b"")
/home/serhiy/py/cpython/Lib/test/test_xxtestfuzz.py:13: DeprecationWarning: module 'sre_constants' is deprecated
  _xxtestfuzz.run(b"")
ok
...

cc @ssbr, @ammaraskar

Linked PRs

• gh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre #109911
• [3.12] gh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre (GH-109911) #109932
• [3.11] gh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre (GH-109911) #109933

Activity

1. serhiy-storchaka

   added

   testsTests in the Lib/test dirTests in the Lib/test dir

   on Sep 7, 2023
2. serhiy-storchaka

   added

   3.11only security fixesonly security fixes

   3.12only security fixesonly security fixes

   3.13only security fixesonly security fixes

   on Sep 26, 2023
3. serhiy-storchaka commented on Sep 26, 2023

   

   serhiy-storchaka

   on Sep 26, 2023

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   cc @ammaraskar

   These tests should be either removed or rewritten using the public API.
4. serhiy-storchaka

   added

   type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or errorAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

   on Sep 26, 2023
5. ammaraskar

   added 2 commits that reference this issue on Sep 26, 2023

   pythongh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre

   be5233d

   pythongh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre

   1e562d7
6. gpshead

   added a commit that references this issue on Sep 26, 2023

   gh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre (#109911)

   a829356
7. miss-islington

   added 2 commits that reference this issue on Sep 26, 2023

   pythongh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre (pythonGH-109911

   9577d79

   pythongh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre (pythonGH-109911

   7d9a97d
8. gpshead commented on Sep 26, 2023

   

   gpshead

   on Sep 26, 2023

   Member

   More actions

   I believe that PR should fix this. if not, please feel free to reopen. thanks for the PR and reviews!
9. gpshead

   closed this as completedon Sep 26, 2023
10. serhiy-storchaka

    added a commit that references this issue on Sep 27, 2023

    [3.11] gh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre (GH-109911) (G…

    8ed9bda
11. serhiy-storchaka commented on Sep 27, 2023

    

    serhiy-storchaka

    on Sep 27, 2023

    MemberAuthor

    More actions

    Do not miss merging in 3.12 branch.
12. serhiy-storchaka commented on Sep 27, 2023

    

    serhiy-storchaka

    on Sep 27, 2023

    MemberAuthor

    More actions

    @gpshead Please do no forgot to edit commit message. It contains a duplicate of the subject and intermediate commit messages.

    Reacted by Gregory P. Smith
13. csm10495

    added a commit that references this issue on Sep 28, 2023

    pythongh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre (python#109911)

    6608db3
14. Yhg1s

    added a commit that references this issue on Oct 2, 2023

    [3.12] gh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre (GH-109911) (#…

    95fd4ed
15. Glyphack

    added a commit that references this issue on Sep 2, 2024

    pythongh-109098: Fuzz re module instead of internal sre (python#109911)

    c526a73

Issue actions