GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Merge m_atan2() and c_atan2() helper functions (or replace libm's atan2) · Issue #122681 · python/cpython Closed Labels type-featureA feature request or enhancementA feature request or enhancement DescriptionFeature or enhancementProposal:With #29179, many workarounds for buggy libm implementations were removed. Yet, there is Lines 546 to 572 in d0b92dd
and Lines 329 to 355 in d0b92dd
They are identical, the second one just uses We should either 1) move first helper to But 2) looks also safe for me: it seems that Has this already been discussed elsewhere?This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere Links to previous discussion of this feature:No response Linked PRsActivity
MetadataMetadataAssigneesLabelstype-featureA feature request or enhancementA feature request or enhancement ProjectsMilestoneRelationshipsDevelopmentIssue actions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |