GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Add pixi definitions for building with the address sanitizer · Issue #142466 · python/cpython

Add pixi definitions for building with the address sanitizer #142466

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed
Closed
Add pixi definitions for building with the address sanitizer#142466
Copy link
Labels
buildThe build process and cross-buildThe build process and cross-buildtype-featureA feature request or enhancementA feature request or enhancement

Description

@FFY00
FFY00
opened on Dec 9, 2025
Issue body actions

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

At the moment, it's fairly painful to test downstream projects with the address sanitizer. We need to compile CPython and the whole dependency tree with the ASAN support, and the environment is pretty fragile.

While working on this for NumPy and SciPy, we found that using pixi's pixi-build feature makes this particular job extremely easier. On account of this, it would be extremely helpful to have pixi definitions directly in the CPython upstream, as that would allow us to test against arbitrary versions/commits of CPython. Otherwise, we would need to have these definitions in a 3rd party repo, and manually bump versions there.

Since CPython's build and install process on POSIX, as well as its dependencies, are so stable, the pixi definitions shouldn't need much maintenance.

IMO it would be extremely helpful to host the definitions in this repository in a best-effort maintenance capacity. The NumPy and SciPy downstreams would be immediate users (numpy/numpy#30381, scipy/scipy#24066).

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

No response given

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

No response

Linked PRs

  • gh-142466: Pixi package definitions for downstream use #142469

Activity

  1. FFY00
    added
    type-featureA feature request or enhancementA feature request or enhancement
    on Dec 9, 2025
  2. hugovk commented on Dec 9, 2025

    @hugovk
    hugovk
    on Dec 9, 2025
    Member
    More actions

    See also python/devguide#1669, cc @lysnikolaou.

    Reacted by Filipe Laíns
  3. FFY00 commented on Dec 9, 2025

    @FFY00
    FFY00
    on Dec 9, 2025
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    Ah, I missed that!

    Reacted by Hugo van Kemenade
  4. lucascolley commented on Dec 9, 2025

    @lucascolley
    lucascolley
    on Dec 9, 2025
    Contributor
    More actions

    let me open a PR with what we have right now, it is far from perfect but hopefully will make it clear to cpython devs what the "best-effort maintenance" would look like

    Reacted by Filipe Laíns
  5. StanFromIreland
    added
    buildThe build process and cross-buildThe build process and cross-build
    on Dec 9, 2025
  6. FFY00
    added a commit that references this issue on Dec 15, 2025

    gh-142466: Pixi package definitions for downstream use (#142469)

    8bb5b6e
  7. fatelei
    added a commit that references this issue on Dec 16, 2025

    pythongh-142466: Pixi package definitions for downstream use (python#…

    9981061
  8. lucascolley commented on Dec 19, 2025

    @lucascolley
    lucascolley
    on Dec 19, 2025
    Contributor
    More actions

    This can be closed

  9. hugovk
    closed this as completedon Dec 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    buildThe build process and cross-buildThe build process and cross-buildtype-featureA feature request or enhancementA feature request or enhancement

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.