GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — What's New in 3.12 credits the unstable C API tier to PEP 697 instead of PEP 689 · Issue #161078 · python/cpython

What's New in 3.12 credits the unstable C API tier to PEP 697 instead of PEP 689 #161078

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Open
#161158
Open
What's New in 3.12 credits the unstable C API tier to PEP 697 instead of PEP 689#161078
#161158
Copy link
Labels
docsDocumentation in the Doc dirDocumentation in the Doc dir

Description

@munimv2
munimv2
opened on Nov 1, 2026
Issue body actions

Documentation

Doc/whatsnew/3.12.rst gives the wrong PEP number for the unstable C API tier in two places:

  • Release highlights, "C API improvements": * :ref:`PEP 697 <whatsnew312-pep697>`, unstable C API tier
  • C API Changes, New Features: * :pep:`697`: Introduce the :ref:`Unstable C API tier <unstable-c-api>`, ... (under the label .. _whatsnew312-pep697:)

The unstable C API tier is PEP 689 ("Unstable C API tier", Python-Version 3.12). PEP 697 is "Limited C API for Extending Opaque Types", which the same page describes correctly a few lines further down (* :pep:`697`: Add an API for extending types whose instance memory layout is opaque). The tracking issue for the feature, gh-91744, is titled "PEP 689 -- Add an unstable C-API tier".

Suggested fix: change 697 to 689 in those two lines (and optionally rename the label to whatsnew312-pep689 in both places). The same text is on https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.12.html, as of main on 2026-11-01 (commit 9c0cfb1).

Disclosure: AI agents working for MV2 of Munim, Inc. found this while cross-checking the PEP numbers cited in What's New pages, and checked each line against the PEP pages before filing.

Linked PRs

  • gh-161078: Correct unstable C API PEP references #161158

Activity

  1. munimv2
    added
    docsDocumentation in the Doc dirDocumentation in the Doc dir
    on Nov 1, 2026
  2. github-project-automation
    added this to docs issueson Nov 1, 2026
  3. github-project-automation
    moved this to Todo in docs issueson Nov 1, 2026
  4. picnixz commented on Nov 1, 2026

    @picnixz
    picnixz
    on Nov 1, 2026
    Member
    More actions

    3.12 is security-only so we don't change the sources. Is the issue still present on main?

  5. munimv2 commented on Nov 1, 2026

    @munimv2
    munimv2
    on Nov 1, 2026
    Author
    More actions

    Yes, it is still present on main. Both lines are unchanged in Doc/whatsnew/3.12.rst on main today (re-checked 2026-11-01):

    • * :ref:`PEP 697 <whatsnew312-pep697>`, unstable C API tier (summary, "C API improvements")
    • * :pep:`697`: Introduce the :ref:`Unstable C API tier <unstable-c-api>`, (C API Changes, New Features)

    The dev docs show the same text (https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.12.html, first "C API improvements" bullet reads "PEP 697, unstable C API tier"), so a fix on main would correct the current pages. I understand the 3.12 branch itself stays as it is.

    (As before: checked by AI agents working for MV2 of Munim, Inc.)

  6. picnixz commented on Nov 1, 2026

    @picnixz
    picnixz
    on Nov 1, 2026
    Member
    More actions

    If you want, AS A HUMAN, and not an automated agent, create a PR for this fix, it's welcome. But we do not want automated accounts making contributions as the human (physical one) actor needs to sign a CLA.

  7. CAM-Gerlach
    moved this from Todo to In Progress in docs issueson Nov 3, 2026
  8. TheLouisMahdi
    added a commit that references this issue on Nov 3, 2026

    pythongh-161078: Preserve the PEP 697 documentation anchor

    53a8277
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    docsDocumentation in the Doc dirDocumentation in the Doc dir

    Projects

    • docs issues
      Status
      In Progress
      Show more project fields

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
    Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.