GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-109702: Increase concurrent_futures deadlock timeout by vstinner · Pull Request #109703 · python/cpython
Conversation
vstinner
commented
Sep 22, 2023
•
edited by bedevere-app
Bot
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Replace SHORT_TIMEOUT with LONG_TIMEOUT in test_deadlock of test_concurrent_futures.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Replace SHORT_TIMEOUT with LONG_TIMEOUT in test_deadlock of
test_concurrent_futures.
|
Thanks @vstinner for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12.
🐍🍒⛏🤖
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️
Hi! The buildbot x86-64 macOS 3.x has failed when building commit 1eb1b45.
What do you need to do:
- Don't panic.
- Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
- Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/366/builds/5426) and take a look at the build logs.
- Check if the failure is related to this commit (1eb1b45) or if it is a false positive.
- If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.
You can take a look at the buildbot page here:
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/366/builds/5426
Failed tests:
- test.test_multiprocessing_forkserver.test_manager
Summary of the results of the build (if available):
==
Click to see traceback logs
remote: Enumerating objects: 11, done.
remote: Counting objects: 9% (1/11)
remote: Counting objects: 18% (2/11)
remote: Counting objects: 27% (3/11)
remote: Counting objects: 36% (4/11)
remote: Counting objects: 45% (5/11)
remote: Counting objects: 54% (6/11)
remote: Counting objects: 63% (7/11)
remote: Counting objects: 72% (8/11)
remote: Counting objects: 81% (9/11)
remote: Counting objects: 90% (10/11)
remote: Counting objects: 100% (11/11)
remote: Counting objects: 100% (11/11), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 25% (1/4)
remote: Compressing objects: 50% (2/4)
remote: Compressing objects: 75% (3/4)
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (4/4)
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done.
remote: Total 6 (delta 5), reused 2 (delta 2), pack-reused 0
From https://github.com/python/cpython
* branch main -> FETCH_HEAD
Note: switching to '1eb1b45183c3b8aeefe3d5d27694155741e82bbc'.
You are in 'detached HEAD' state. You can look around, make experimental
changes and commit them, and you can discard any commits you make in this
state without impacting any branches by switching back to a branch.
If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create, you may
do so (now or later) by using -c with the switch command. Example:
git switch -c <new-branch-name>
Or undo this operation with:
git switch -
Turn off this advice by setting config variable advice.detachedHead to false
HEAD is now at 1eb1b45183 gh-109702: Increase concurrent_futures deadlock timeout (#109703)
Switched to and reset branch 'main'
configure: WARNING: pkg-config is missing. Some dependencies may not be detected correctly.
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/ranlib: file: libpython3.13d.a(dynamic_annotations.o) has no symbols
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/ranlib: file: libpython3.13d.a(pymath.o) has no symbols
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
./Modules/readline.c:1256:21: warning: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'Function *' (aka 'int (*)(const char *, int)') from 'int (void)' [-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types]
rl_startup_hook = on_startup_hook;
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./Modules/readline.c:1258:23: warning: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'Function *' (aka 'int (*)(const char *, int)') from 'int (void)' [-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types]
rl_pre_input_hook = on_pre_input_hook;
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
ld: warning: -undefined dynamic_lookup may not work with chained fixups
Kill <WorkerThread #2 running test=test_math pid=49775 time=48.3 sec> process group
Warning -- Failed to join <WorkerThread #2 running test=test_math pid=49775 time=1 min 18 sec> in 30.4 sec
make: *** [buildbottest] Error 5
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Thanks @vstinner for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️
Hi! The buildbot s390x RHEL8 LTO + PGO 3.x has failed when building commit 1eb1b45.
What do you need to do:
- Don't panic.
- Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
- Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/442/builds/5016) and take a look at the build logs.
- Check if the failure is related to this commit (1eb1b45) or if it is a false positive.
- If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.
You can take a look at the buildbot page here:
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/442/builds/5016
Failed tests:
Failed subtests:
- test_lockf - main.FNTLEINTRTest.test_lockf
- test_all - test.test_eintr.EINTRTests.test_all
Summary of the results of the build (if available):
==
Click to see traceback logs
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/test/test_eintr.py", line 17, in test_all
script_helper.run_test_script(script)
File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/test/support/script_helper.py", line 300, in run_test_script
raise AssertionError(f"{name} failed")
AssertionError: script _test_eintr.py failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/test/_test_eintr.py", line 523, in test_lockf
self._lock(fcntl.lockf, "lockf")
File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/test/_test_eintr.py", line 515, in _lock
self.assertGreaterEqual(dt, self.sleep_time)
AssertionError: 0.19762988499132916 not greater than or equal to 0.2
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
csm10495
pushed a commit
to csm10495/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2023
…#109703)
Replace SHORT_TIMEOUT with LONG_TIMEOUT in test_deadlock of
test_concurrent_futures.
Glyphack
pushed a commit
to Glyphack/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2024
…#109703)
Replace SHORT_TIMEOUT with LONG_TIMEOUT in test_deadlock of
test_concurrent_futures.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|