GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-37223, test_io: silence last 'Exception ignored in:' by vstinner · Pull Request #14029 · python/cpython

Conversation

@vstinner

@vstinner vstinner commented Jun 12, 2019 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Use catch_unraisable_exception() to ignore 'Exception ignored in:'
error when the internal BufferedWriter of the BufferedRWPair is
destroyed. The C implementation doesn't give access to the
BufferedWriter, so just ignore the warning instead.

https://bugs.python.org/issue37223

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@vstinner
bpo-37223, test_io: silence last 'Exception ignored in:'
053481b
Use catch_unraisable_exception() to ignore 'Exception ignored in:'
error when the internal BufferedWriter of the BufferedRWPair is
destroyed. The C implementation doesn't give access to the
BufferedWriter, so just ignore the warning instead.
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label Jun 12, 2019
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added tests Tests in the Lib/test dir awaiting core review labels Jun 12, 2019
@vstinner vstinner added the skip news label Jun 12, 2019
@vstinner
vstinner merged commit 913fa1c into python:master Jun 12, 2019
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting core review label Jun 12, 2019
@vstinner
vstinner deleted the test_io_silence branch June 12, 2019 21:57
vstinner added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2019
@vstinner
bpo-37223: test_io: silence destructor errors (GH-14031)
c15a682
* bpo-18748: Fix _pyio.IOBase destructor (closed case) (GH-13952)

_pyio.IOBase destructor now does nothing if getting the closed
attribute fails to better mimick _io.IOBase finalizer.

(cherry picked from commit 4f6f7c5)

* bpo-37223: test_io: silence destructor errors (GH-13954)

Implement also MockNonBlockWriterIO.seek() method.

(cherry picked from commit b589cef)

* bpo-37223, test_io: silence last 'Exception ignored in:' (GH-14029)

Use catch_unraisable_exception() to ignore 'Exception ignored in:'
error when the internal BufferedWriter of the BufferedRWPair is
destroyed. The C implementation doesn't give access to the
internal BufferedWriter, so just ignore the warning instead.

(cherry picked from commit 913fa1c)
lisroach pushed a commit to lisroach/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2019
@vstinner @lisroach
bpo-37223, test_io: silence last 'Exception ignored in:' (pythonGH-14029
dec4b2f
)

Use catch_unraisable_exception() to ignore 'Exception ignored in:'
error when the internal BufferedWriter of the BufferedRWPair is
destroyed. The C implementation doesn't give access to the
internal BufferedWriter, so just ignore the warning instead.
DinoV pushed a commit to DinoV/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
@vstinner @DinoV
bpo-37223, test_io: silence last 'Exception ignored in:' (pythonGH-14029
e18a1de
)

Use catch_unraisable_exception() to ignore 'Exception ignored in:'
error when the internal BufferedWriter of the BufferedRWPair is
destroyed. The C implementation doesn't give access to the
internal BufferedWriter, so just ignore the warning instead.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip news tests Tests in the Lib/test dir

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@vstinner @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.