GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-44351: Restore back parse_makefile in distutils.sysconfig by frenzymadness · Pull Request #26637 · python/cpython

Conversation

@frenzymadness

@frenzymadness frenzymadness commented Jun 10, 2021 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The function uses distutils.text_file.TextFile and therefore
behaves differently than _parse_makefile in sysconfig.

This is a regression caused by a try to merge distutils.sysconfig and sysconfig in #23142

https://bugs.python.org/issue44351

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@frenzymadness
bpo-44351: Restore back parse_makefile in distutils.sysconfig
543e49f
The function uses distutils.text_file.TextFile and therefore
behaves differently than _parse_makefile in sysconfig.
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label Jun 10, 2021
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting review label Jun 10, 2021
hroncok
hroncok approved these changes Jun 11, 2021
View reviewed changes

@hroncok hroncok left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code is different than Python 3.9 code wrt. compiled re patterns / strings. The differences are reasonable. Other than that, it is a straight revert / restore.

I'd add a regression test, however this is distutils, so not a hard requirement.

Thank you.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting core review and removed awaiting review labels Jun 11, 2021
@encukou encukou added the needs backport to 3.10 label Jun 11, 2021
@encukou
encukou merged commit fc98266 into python:main Jun 11, 2021
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jun 11, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @frenzymadness for the PR, and @encukou for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖 I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed awaiting core review needs backport to 3.10 labels Jun 11, 2021
@bedevere-bot

bedevere-bot commented Jun 11, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-26673 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2021
@frenzymadness @miss-islington
bpo-44351: Restore back parse_makefile in distutils.sysconfig (python…
e2bab34
…GH-26637)

The function uses distutils.text_file.TextFile and therefore
behaves differently than _parse_makefile in sysconfig.
(cherry picked from commit fc98266)

Co-authored-by: Lumír 'Frenzy' Balhar <[email protected]>
encukou pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2021
@miss-islington @frenzymadness
bpo-44351: Restore back parse_makefile in distutils.sysconfig (GH-26637…
2f2ea96
…) (GH-26673)

The function uses distutils.text_file.TextFile and therefore
behaves differently than _parse_makefile in sysconfig.
(cherry picked from commit fc98266)

Co-authored-by: Lumír 'Frenzy' Balhar <[email protected]>
@pablogsal pablogsal mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2021
[3.10] Correct the order of regen-abidump #27228
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer
@hroncok hroncok hroncok approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

6 participants

@frenzymadness @miss-islington @bedevere-bot @hroncok @encukou @the-knights-who-say-ni
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.