GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [2.7] bpo-28598: Support __rmod__ for RHS subclasses of str in % string formatting operations by zhangyangyu · Pull Request #366 · python/cpython

Conversation

@zhangyangyu

@zhangyangyu zhangyangyu commented Mar 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

backports to 2.7 for #51

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@zhangyangyu
backport bpo-28598
7f8d9fc
@zhangyangyu zhangyangyu added the cherry-pick for 2.7 label Mar 1, 2017
@zhangyangyu
zhangyangyu requested a review from serhiy-storchaka March 1, 2017 04:18
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label Mar 1, 2017
@mention-bot

mention-bot commented Mar 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@zhangyangyu, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @benjaminp, @gvanrossum and @loewis to be potential reviewers.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka approved these changes Mar 1, 2017
View reviewed changes
@zhangyangyu
zhangyangyu merged commit b4f0e98 into python:2.7 Mar 1, 2017
@zhangyangyu
zhangyangyu deleted the backport-bpo-28598 branch March 1, 2017 06:28
@zhangyangyu zhangyangyu mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2017
[backport to 2.7] bpo-28598: Support __rmod__ for RHS subclasses of str in % string formatting operations #382
Closed
SonicField added a commit to SonicField/cpython that referenced this pull request May 12, 2026
@SonicField
docs/methodology: synthetic-falsifier-at-gate (defensive-infra discip…
1546c43
…line)

Authored per supervisor 22:23:05Z disposition of pythia python#366 +
23:38:14Z directive (post-c13 codification batch). Moves synthetic-
falsifier-at-gate rule from chat-resident decision (D-1778621243) into
docs/methodology/ structural location, addressing pythia python#366's central
critique: rule-as-text vs rule-as-enforcement.

Files:
  NEW docs/methodology/synthetic_falsifier_at_gate.md  (+75 LOC)

Specifies:
- Motivation (2026-05-12 a2e8808 hook bash if-then-fi bug shipped
  through normal review; c8/c9/c10 hook-theatrical window; surfaced by
  pythia python#364 falsifier dispatch + 21:25Z synthetic test)
- Covered defensive-infra paths (scripts/pre-commit-*, .git/hooks/*,
  scripts/gate_phoenix.sh, scripts/build_phoenix.sh, sidecar/restart
  infra, *_verify.cpp static_assert files)
- 3-step test pattern (inject regression -> verify guard fires -> revert,
  cite outcome in commit body)
- Examples per defensive-infra class (pre-commit hook, Tier 1 gate,
  static_assert verifier, sidecar/restart enforcement)
- Self-falsifying disclaimer (rule is itself defensive infrastructure;
  2026-05-12 incident was unintentional first falsifier of the rule's
  NEED, not its sufficiency)
- Enforcement chain (author-side cite + gatekeeper APPROVE checklist +
  medic flag + supervisor dispose)
- Out-of-scope (routine code, docs-only, test-only, natural-failure bug
  fixes)
- Non-coverage caveat (raises floor, does not raise ceiling)

NOT a v2.x amendment per moratorium (D-1778554524) — operational
discipline / methodology document. Per pythia python#366 6-month-regret
framing: this addendum is the move-the-rule-from-chat-to-corpus
intervention; whether agents actually run synthetic-falsifier tests at
defensive-infra commit time is the falsifier of THIS document.

PRE-COMMIT BUILD: doc-only; pre-commit hook docs-path-skip per
a2e8808 self-config (verified 21:48:32Z generalist x86 install).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@zhangyangyu @mention-bot @serhiy-storchaka @the-knights-who-say-ni
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.