GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-29557: Remove abiguous line in binhex docs by davidwilemski · Pull Request #90 · python/cpython Conversation
Contributor
"appears to not work in all cases" does not inspire confidence in this It appears this comment was from the original documentation for this function in 1995 but the commit also does not include any context regarding a bug: https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3911d4a89ab0#l4.40
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions"appears to not work in all cases" does not inspire confidence in this module. I can find no context for what bug this was referencing so it should be removed.
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks for the PR! I think your analysis looks correct. However, it would be nice to record your research on bugs.python.org. Also, we can get more feedback from other core developers since not all of them subscribe to the GitHub repository. See also step 5 at http://cpython-devguide.readthedocs.io/#quick-start
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
berkerpeksag
approved these changes
Member
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Mariatta
referenced
this pull request
in Mariatta/cpython
"appears to not work in all cases" does not inspire confidence in this module. I can find no context for what bug this was referencing so it should be removed. (cherry picked from commit 6de2b78)
Mariatta
referenced
this pull request
in Mariatta/cpython
"appears to not work in all cases" does not inspire confidence in this module. I can find no context for what bug this was referencing so it should be removed. (cherry picked from commit 6de2b78)
Mariatta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mariatta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
akruis
pushed a commit
to akruis/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
…ets. Unbinding (tasklet.bind(None) ) of main tasklets caused an assertion violation. Now it raises RuntimError. https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless/issues/90 (grafted from 58b930a8a1d931da2f5bc834681af5d1452e1733 and 46335aa61c7c)
jaraco
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Update the readme indicating that the PR will be assigned to the core dev for follow up.
This was referenced
SonicField
added a commit
to SonicField/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Implements scripts/w45_bridge_drift_falsifier.sh per docs/w45-bridge-signature-drift-falsifier.md. Mutate-Build-Verify-Restore loop: - Mutates a bridge signature (extern "C" decl in builder.cpp + function definition in builder_emit_c.c, in lockstep) by appending a sentinel param 'int phx_w45_drift'. - Verifies the build fails at the C++ dispatch-switch call site (which has the OLD arity). - Restores both files; clean rebuild verifies tree state. Catches the structural drift class identified by pythia python#90/python#91: void* args at the bridge crossing erase the type-safety C++ overload resolution would normally provide. 252+ dispatch sites in builder.cpp post Phase 1 burndown — manual audit unscalable. Initial 6 fixtures (per spec §2.2 + §2.6 retro): - hir_builder_emit_before_with_c (Phase 1 python#6 retro) - hir_builder_emit_setup_with_c (Phase 1 python#7 retro) - hir_builder_emit_format_simple_c (Phase 1 python#2 sample) - hir_builder_emit_copy_free_vars_c (Phase 1 python#4 sample) - hir_builder_emit_get_yield_from_iter_c (Phase 1 python#4 sample) - hir_builder_emit_primitive_load_const_c (Phase 1 python#5 sample) Modes: - --dry-run: stage mutations, no build (any agent — bypass build lock) - --strict: exit 1 on FAIL (for gate integration) - --verbose: show build stderr Uses perl -0777 multi-line slurp for robust parsing of multi-line extern decls + function definitions. Mutation marker (phx_w45_drift) verified post-mutation to guard against silent no-op substitutions. Build lock: BUILD mode invokes cmake --build --target jit; per CLAUDE.md Phase 3D Build Lock, only testkeeper / gate_phoenix.sh may invoke with builds enabled. --dry-run is unrestricted. Authorization: theologian 21:55:24Z + supervisor 21:55:36Z + 22:33:17Z DISPOSITION (C). §3.5 fold-into-C derivation falsifier (opcode-constant shadow class) is deferred — needs W21 golden integration. Sibling workstreams: W33 (zero-bridge verifier), W42 (refcount correctness), W44 (DO-NOT-USE caller gate).
SonicField
added a commit
to SonicField/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Per testkeeper 22:44:12Z STRICT VERIFY: BUILD MODE was running 'cmake --build .' from REPO_ROOT, but cmake build dir is Python/jit_build/build. All 6 fixtures errored with "not a CMake build directory" → counted as FAIL → false GATE FAIL. Fix: introduce CMAKE_BUILD_DIR variable + pass to both cmake calls (per-fixture build at L153, post-restore rebuild at L194). Concept already EMPIRICALLY VERIFIED by testkeeper manual sanity-test on hir_builder_emit_format_simple_c — build failed at builder.cpp:2492 with "no matching function" + "candidate function not viable: requires 4 arguments, but 3 were provided". Exact void*-arg-erasure detection pythia python#90/python#91 named. Post-fix expected: 6/6 PASS in BUILD MODE.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |