GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Doc: Make functions.html readable again. by JulienPalard · Pull Request #99476 · python/cpython

Conversation

@JulienPalard

@JulienPalard JulienPalard commented Nov 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

closes #98340

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@JulienPalard
Doc: Make functions.html readable again.
2f6e6f8
@JulienPalard JulienPalard added docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news labels Nov 14, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting core review label Nov 14, 2022
@JulienPalard JulienPalard mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2022
Revert "gh-91485: Doc: Using Python syntax to document builtin Python functions." #98352
Closed
rhettinger
rhettinger approved these changes Nov 19, 2022
View reviewed changes
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting core review labels Nov 19, 2022
@JulienPalard
JulienPalard merged commit 858cb79 into python:main Nov 19, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting merge label Nov 19, 2022
@JulienPalard
JulienPalard deleted the mdk-functions-more-readable branch November 19, 2022 10:25
@JulienPalard JulienPalard added the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label Nov 19, 2022
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Nov 19, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @JulienPalard for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2022
@JulienPalard @miss-islington
Doc: Make functions.html readable again. (pythonGH-99476)
760ce5c 
(cherry picked from commit 858cb79)

Co-authored-by: Julien Palard <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot

bedevere-bot commented Nov 19, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-99592 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label Nov 19, 2022
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2022
@miss-islington @JulienPalard
Doc: Make functions.html readable again. (GH-99476)
a15ab1e 
(cherry picked from commit 858cb79)

Co-authored-by: Julien Palard <[email protected]>
hauntsaninja added a commit to hauntsaninja/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2022
@hauntsaninja
pythongh-100546: Remove incorrect positional-only marker from eval
32673d2 
All the arguments are positional-only.

The current status after python#99476 seems to be to not use positional-only
markers in documentation (although there are still three others in this
file). I asked for clarification in
python#100546 (comment).
hauntsaninja added a commit to hauntsaninja/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2022
@hauntsaninja
pythongh-100546: Remove incorrect positional-only marker from eval
5f05995 
All the arguments are positional-only.

The current status after python#99476 seems to be to not use positional-only
markers in documentation, hence I've simply removed it.

That said, there are still three other positional-only markers in this
file).  I asked for clarification in
python#100546 (comment).
See also python#98340
@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja mentioned this pull request Dec 27, 2022
gh-100546: Remove incorrect positional-only marker from eval #100547
Merged
@miss-islington miss-islington mentioned this pull request Jan 1, 2023
[3.11] gh-100546: Remove incorrect positional-only marker from eval (GH-100547) #100654
Merged
hauntsaninja added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2023
@hauntsaninja
gh-100546: Remove incorrect positional-only marker from eval (#100547)
71159a8 
All the arguments are positional-only.

The current status after #99476 seems to be to not use positional-only
markers in documentation, hence I've simply removed it.
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2023
@hauntsaninja @miss-islington
pythongh-100546: Remove incorrect positional-only marker from eval (p…
13173f8 
…ythonGH-100547)

All the arguments are positional-only.

The current status after pythonGH-99476 seems to be to not use positional-only
markers in documentation, hence I've simply removed it.
(cherry picked from commit 71159a8)

Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2023
@miss-islington @hauntsaninja
gh-100546: Remove incorrect positional-only marker from eval (GH-100547)
7ed7127 
All the arguments are positional-only.

The current status after GH-99476 seems to be to not use positional-only
markers in documentation, hence I've simply removed it.
(cherry picked from commit 71159a8)

Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
@chris-eibl chris-eibl mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2024
Built-in function range params discrepancy across versions #125897
Closed
@chris-eibl chris-eibl mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2024
gh-125897: Use positional-only parameter indicators for range() #125945
Merged
@skirpichev skirpichev mentioned this pull request Mar 29, 2025
gh-131885: Updates docs to make max and min iterable param positional only #131868
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rhettinger rhettinger rhettinger approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[idea] Ease understanding of positional-only and keyword-only makers in function prototyes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@JulienPalard @miss-islington @bedevere-bot @rhettinger
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.