GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Adapt to SuiteSparse:GraphBLAS 10.5.0 and read its version from the library by eriknw · Pull Request #628 · python-graphblas/python-graphblas Conversation
Member
New bottom of the stack; #587 and the chain above it now build on this. SuiteSparse:GraphBLAS 10.5.0 stopped checking, after a build, whether every value happened to be the same: "GrB_Matrix_build and GrB_Vector_build: no longer do a post-iso check; they leave the matrix in non-iso format even if all the entries are the same." Four tests read that check as if it were python-graphblas's own contract and went red. Each one wanted an iso object rather than an inference, so each now asks for one with The version gates had a second, quieter problem.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions…ibrary 10.5.0 stopped checking, after a build, whether every value happened to be the same: "GrB_Matrix_build and GrB_Vector_build: no longer do a post-iso check; they leave the matrix in non-iso format even if all the entries are the same." Four tests read that check as if it were python-graphblas's own contract and went red. Each one wanted an iso object rather than an inference, so each now asks for one with ``ss.build_scalar``, which means the same thing on every SuiteSparse version and produces the same storage formats the tests were selecting for. ``from_coo`` is left alone: adding a scan of the values to recover the old behavior would re-add the cost upstream just removed. The version gates had a second, quieter problem. ``graphblas.core.ss`` derived the C library version by parsing ``suitesparse_graphblas.__version__``, which is the version of the Python wrapper. The two normally agree, but a development build between releases reports the previous one: psg 10.4.1.0 against a 10.5.0 library here, so every gate saw 10.4.1 and any 10.5 branch would have been silently skipped. Read the library's own GxB_IMPLEMENTATION_* constants instead, falling back to the old parse where a build does not expose them. test_openmp_enabled keeps its hard assertion and gains a message saying what is wrong and that the fault is in the installed build. It caught a real one: conda-forge's first graphblas 10.5.0 build on osx-arm64 shipped without OpenMP. The build 1 rebuild (2026-08-26) restored OpenMP and the assertion passes again.
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersNo reviewsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |