RISC-V International is a nonprofit organization that is the caretaker of the RISC-V instruction set. RISC-V International does not support open source hardware projects. Other organizations support them.

No. RISC-V International does not support open source hardware projects. Other organizations support them.

In March 2020, the RISC-V International Association moved its incorporation to Switzerland. The move, approved by the RISC-V International Board of Directors, was a decision made to ensure continued ecosystem growth of the open standard for years to come. RISC-V International is not incorporated in Switzerland based on any one country, company, government, or event. The IP contributed and produced by RISC-V International is held under industry and global standard licenses that are already open to leverage by any company regardless of jurisdiction.

The entire tech ecosystem benefits from standards being open, whether it’s RISC-V or other popular standards such Ethernet, HTTPS, JPEG, or USB. 

Three key reasons RISC-V is strategically important:

1. Open Standards have been critical to technology innovation, adoption, and growth for decades
2. Open Standards create access to opportunities and spur growth for a wide range of stakeholders (jobs, consumers, research, academia, industry, etc)
3. RISC-V is the defined open standard Instruction Set Architecture for Computing

Throughout history, interoperable standards provide incentives for more customers to buy new types of products, creating additional opportunities for more vendors to provide them, competing on value-added features and services. Compatibility based on such standards is essential for innovation on a global basis within the larger tech ecosystem. Competition is not based on shared standards, but rather on the unique value that each vendor adds on top of the standardized layer.

Engaging in the cultivation of global standards has long been a hallmark of technical leaders in the US as well as around the world, who have not only participated across the spectrum of traditional standards organizations but led the way in forming more than a thousand consortia, alliances, and fora that have brought some of the most important information and communications technology standards to the marketplace.

When software talks to hardware, it uses a vocabulary called an instruction set. Examples of words or instructions in the vocabulary are also on the keys of a calculator: add, subtract, multiply, and so on. Programs consist of millions of these simple instructions executed billions of times.

Riding Moore’s Law, by the 1980s microprocessors grew so much in performance that they could challenge large computers. The question was what was the best vocabulary or instruction set for these rapidly improving microprocessors? Should it change from the instruction sets of the large computers that powered the industry of the 1970s? 

To understand this vital question about the interface between software and hardware, we need more context. It was so tedious to program in the low-level machine language that computer pioneers soon invented high-level programming languages that were easier to use plus programs that translated from high-level languages to machine language, called compilers. Regarding instruction sets for microprocessors, the programmers’ burden of writing in low-level machine language was no longer an issue. Instead, the question was can compilers produce efficient programs for a given vocabulary?

We called the large computers with vocabularies that followed conventional wisdom “complex instruction set computers” abbreviated CISC and pronounced “sisk”. If microprocessors instead used vocabularies with simple instructions, they were called “reduced instruction set computers” abbreviated RISC and pronounced “risk.” Think of CISC as having many polysyllabic words while RISC has monosyllabic words. RISC advocates thought it would be easier to build microprocessors that understood RISC vocabularies than CISC vocabularies and easier for compilers to generate RISC programs than CISC programs.

To answer whether RISC or CISC is better, we needed to discover the ratios of the average number of instructions a program needs to read—the complex CISC instructions should be fewer than RISC—versus the average time to read one instruction—the simple RISC instructions should be read faster than CISC instructions. It was  discovered that RISC reads a few more instructions (approximately 30% more) but reads them so much faster (around 5 times faster) that the net result is that RISC is 3 to 4 times faster than CISC. Of the processors shipped each year, 99% are now RISCs.

UC Berkeley did four generations of RISC projects in the 1980s. The effort in 2010 to build a new RISC instruction set based on everything learned in the intervening 30 years was called RISC-V (“risk five”) to honor the prior Berkeley projects (RISC-I, RISC-II, …).

Yes. See Ratified Specifications.

Yes. View the Ratified Specifications.

There are a wide variety of software tools available; proceed to the RISC-V Landscape to see a list.

The RISC-V ISA is free and open with a permissive license for use by anyone in all types of implementations. Designers are free to develop proprietary or open source implementations for commercial or other exploitations as they see fit. RISC-V International encourages all implementations that are compliant to the specifications.

Note that the use of the RISC-V trademark requires a license which is granted to members of RISC-V International for use with compliant implementations. The RISC-V specification is based around a structure which allows flexibility with modular extensions and additional custom instructions/extensions. If an implementation was based on the RISC-V specification but includes modifications beyond this framework, then it cannot be referenced as RISC-V.

There is no fee to use the RISC-V ISA. Those who want to use the RISC-V logo should join RISC-V International. To create an implementation from the RISC-V ISA, it is necessary to procure or leverage additional IP outside of RISC-V which may carry a fee. The RISC-V ISA alone is not an implementation.

Designers of computer chips use ISAs, but it is also used by developers of system software for those chips (for operating systems, compilers, debuggers, and so on.) In fact, anyone with a new idea application needs to pick the ISAs on which their software will run, so they are also users of ISAs. Finally, ISAs play an important role in education, as students who want to understand the organization of computers need to learn it at the ISA level. In fact, part of the original motivation for RISC-V was to have an ISA that would be easy to learn and use in the classroom.

No, the source code can be completely closed.

No. This question is an apples-and-oranges comparison. Linux is a computer artifact, software that you can run on your laptop computer.  In contrast, RISC-V is a specification of a vocabulary for a computer. The closest analogy to the RISC-V specification is a book that defines words, like a dictionary.  A dictionary can’t run programs.

“Open source” is traditionally associated with software for which the original source code is made freely available and may be redistributed and modified. An open standard is a standard that is openly accessible and usable by anyone, such as ISO 668:2020, WiFi, Bluetooth or TCP/IP. It is also a common prerequisite that open standards use an open license that provides for extensibility. Read more.

Part of the confusion is that the RISC-V specification enables civic-minded organizations to make hardware designs that are open sourced like Linux software, in that anyone can download them to get a headstart in building hardware. An instruction set standard like RISC-V is essentially necessary to enable open source hardware projects—as you don’t want to build the software stack all by yourself—but using RISC-V does not require that processors that adopt its instruction set must be open sourced.

In the 1950s, Malcolm Maclean invented the idea of a reusable shipping container that could be transported by trucks, trains, and ships. Having a standard specification—8’x8.5’x40’ of corrugated steel—allowed shipping containers to be transported and manufactured anywhere in the world. The official name of the shipping container standard is International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 668:2020. Instead of shipping boxes on top of wooden pallets, containers offered so many benefits that they are credited with eventually increasing the world’s economy. Without a global standard specification, each country could have their own container design, which would be tremendously inefficient.

The RISC-V instruction set architecture (ISA) and related specifications are developed, ratified and maintained by RISC-V International contributing members within the RISC-V International Technical Working Groups. Work on the specification is performed on GitHub, and the GitHub issue mechanism can be used to provide input into the specification.