GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — prepare release 3.10.0.0 by JelleZijlstra · Pull Request #805 · python/typing Conversation
Fidget-Spinner
approved these changes
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks! Changing the tox env versions for the
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Off topic: I see #247 and python/cpython#16204 saying typing became implicitly non-provisional in 3.7 because no new features were added, but PEP 484 still says
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Good catch, I opened python/peps#1942 to fix it.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I wonder if it's too early to also add to the
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah I was thinking about that. Let me just run the test suite on current CPython master to be sure.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
|
| The ``typing_extensions`` module contains backports of these changes. | ||
| Experimental types that will eventually be added to the ``typing`` | ||
| module are also included in ``typing_extensions``, such as | ||
| ``typing.ParamSpec`` and ``typing.TypeGuard``. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And also IntVar, which still doesn't have a PEP proposing it.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
PEP 484 is still marked as "Provisional", but as @Fidget-Spinner pointed out in python/typing#805, it shouldn't be any more. python/cpython#16204 removed talk about typing's provisional status from the module docs, and enhancements to typing have been in the form of new PEPs for the last few release cycles. Going to mark this as a draft so Guido can have a chance to comment once he's back.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.