GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Improve assert_type phrasing by hauntsaninja · Pull Request #104081 · python/cpython

Conversation

@hauntsaninja

@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja commented May 2, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'd like to make the fact that this does nothing at runtime really obvious, since I suspect this is unintuitive for users who are unfamiliar with static type checking.

I thought of this because of
https://discuss.python.org/t/add-arg-check-type-to-types/26384 wherein I'm a little skeptical that the user really did want assert_type.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--104081.org.readthedocs.build/

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@hauntsaninja
Improve assert_type phrasing
3c80459
I'd like to make the fact that this does nothing at runtime
really obvious, since I suspect this is unintuitive for users who are
unfamiliar with static type checking.

I thought of this because of
https://discuss.python.org/t/add-arg-check-type-to-types/26384
wherein I'm skeptical that the user really did want `assert_type`.
@hauntsaninja
hauntsaninja requested review from AlexWaygood, Fidget-Spinner, JelleZijlstra and gvanrossum as code owners May 2, 2023 04:33
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting core review label May 2, 2023
@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja added skip issue skip news needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes labels May 2, 2023
JelleZijlstra
JelleZijlstra reviewed May 2, 2023
View reviewed changes
Comment thread Lib/typing.py Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

JelleZijlstra
JelleZijlstra approved these changes May 2, 2023
View reviewed changes

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good minus the typo

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting core review labels May 2, 2023
@hauntsaninja @JelleZijlstra
Update Lib/typing.py
9376fba
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <[email protected]>
@gvanrossum

gvanrossum commented May 2, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I always thought it shouldn't have been called assert-something, because of this misunderstanding, but I was overruled. :-(

hauntsaninja reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@hauntsaninja
hauntsaninja merged commit 82ba6ce into python:main May 2, 2023
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented May 2, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @hauntsaninja for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting merge label May 2, 2023
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented May 2, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry @hauntsaninja, I had trouble checking out the 3.11 backport branch.
Please retry by removing and re-adding the "needs backport to 3.11" label.
Alternatively, you can backport using cherry_picker on the command line.
cherry_picker 82ba6ce303d04a7b21034e38d220e23ca9f1dc0a 3.11

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@miss-islington miss-islington assigned hauntsaninja May 2, 2023
@hauntsaninja
hauntsaninja deleted the assert-type branch May 2, 2023 06:05
@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja added needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes and removed needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes labels May 2, 2023
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented May 2, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @hauntsaninja for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@bedevere-bot

bedevere-bot commented May 2, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-104084 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request May 2, 2023
@hauntsaninja @miss-islington
Improve assert_type phrasing (pythonGH-104081)
74be000
I'd like to make the fact that this does nothing at runtime
really obvious, since I suspect this is unintuitive for users who are
unfamiliar with static type checking.

I thought of this because of
https://discuss.python.org/t/add-arg-check-type-to-types/26384
wherein I'm skeptical that the user really did want `assert_type`.
(cherry picked from commit 82ba6ce)

Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label May 2, 2023
AlexWaygood pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2023
@miss-islington @hauntsaninja
[3.11] Improve assert_type phrasing (GH-104081) (#104084)
3e7e50e
Improve assert_type phrasing (GH-104081)

I'd like to make the fact that this does nothing at runtime
really obvious, since I suspect this is unintuitive for users who are
unfamiliar with static type checking.

I thought of this because of
https://discuss.python.org/t/add-arg-check-type-to-types/26384
wherein I'm skeptical that the user really did want `assert_type`.
(cherry picked from commit 82ba6ce)

Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
carljm added a commit to carljm/cpython that referenced this pull request May 2, 2023
@carljm
Merge branch 'main' into inlinecomp2
0727d6f
* main:
  pythongh-103822: [Calendar] change return value to enum for day and month APIs (pythonGH-103827)
  pythongh-65022: Fix description of tuple return value in copyreg (python#103892)
  pythonGH-103525: Improve exception message from `pathlib.PurePath()` (pythonGH-103526)
  pythongh-84436: Add integration C API tests for immortal objects (pythongh-103962)
  pythongh-103743: Add PyUnstable_Object_GC_NewWithExtraData (pythonGH-103744)
  pythongh-102997: Update Windows installer to SQLite 3.41.2. (python#102999)
  pythonGH-103484: Fix redirected permanently URLs (python#104001)
  Improve assert_type phrasing (python#104081)
  pythongh-102997: Update macOS installer to SQLite 3.41.2. (pythonGH-102998)
  pythonGH-103472: close response in HTTPConnection._tunnel (python#103473)
  pythongh-88496: IDLE - fix another test on macOS (python#104075)
  pythongh-94673: Hide Objects in PyTypeObject Behind Accessors (pythongh-104074)
  pythongh-94673: Properly Initialize and Finalize Static Builtin Types for Each Interpreter (pythongh-104072)
  pythongh-104016: Skip test for deeply neste f-strings on wasi (python#104071)
carljm added a commit to carljm/cpython that referenced this pull request May 2, 2023
@carljm
Merge branch 'main' into cached_property_docs
b9c39e3
* main: (760 commits)
  pythonGH-104102: Optimize `pathlib.Path.glob()` handling of `../` pattern segments (pythonGH-104103)
  pythonGH-104104: Optimize `pathlib.Path.glob()` by avoiding repeated calls to `os.path.normcase()` (pythonGH-104105)
  pythongh-103822: [Calendar] change return value to enum for day and month APIs (pythonGH-103827)
  pythongh-65022: Fix description of tuple return value in copyreg (python#103892)
  pythonGH-103525: Improve exception message from `pathlib.PurePath()` (pythonGH-103526)
  pythongh-84436: Add integration C API tests for immortal objects (pythongh-103962)
  pythongh-103743: Add PyUnstable_Object_GC_NewWithExtraData (pythonGH-103744)
  pythongh-102997: Update Windows installer to SQLite 3.41.2. (python#102999)
  pythonGH-103484: Fix redirected permanently URLs (python#104001)
  Improve assert_type phrasing (python#104081)
  pythongh-102997: Update macOS installer to SQLite 3.41.2. (pythonGH-102998)
  pythonGH-103472: close response in HTTPConnection._tunnel (python#103473)
  pythongh-88496: IDLE - fix another test on macOS (python#104075)
  pythongh-94673: Hide Objects in PyTypeObject Behind Accessors (pythongh-104074)
  pythongh-94673: Properly Initialize and Finalize Static Builtin Types for Each Interpreter (pythongh-104072)
  pythongh-104016: Skip test for deeply neste f-strings on wasi (python#104071)
  pythongh-104057: Fix direct invocation of test_super (python#104064)
  pythongh-87092: Expose assembler to unit tests (python#103988)
  pythongh-97696: asyncio eager tasks factory (python#102853)
  pythongh-84436: Immortalize in _PyStructSequence_InitBuiltinWithFlags() (pythongh-104054)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra approved these changes
@gvanrossum gvanrossum Awaiting requested review from gvanrossum
@Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner Awaiting requested review from Fidget-Spinner
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood Awaiting requested review from AlexWaygood AlexWaygood is a code owner

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja

Labels

skip issue skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

5 participants

@hauntsaninja @gvanrossum @miss-islington @bedevere-bot @JelleZijlstra
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.