GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Few coverage nitpicks for the cmath module by skirpichev · Pull Request #102067 · python/cpython

Conversation

@skirpichev

@skirpichev skirpichev commented Feb 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • partial tests for cosh/sinh overflows (L535 and L771). I doubt both ||-ed conditions could be tested.
  • removed inaccessible case in sqrt (L832): ax=ay=0 is handled above (L823) because fabs() is exact. Also added test (checked with mpmath and gmpy2) for second condition on that line.
  • some trivial tests for isclose (cover all conditions on L1217-1218)
  • add comment for uncovered L1018

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@skirpichev
Few coverage nitpicks for the cmath module
e368127
- partial tests for cosh/sinh overflows (L535 and L771).  I doubt
  both ||-ed conditions could be tested.
- removed inaccessible case in sqrt (L832): ax=ay=0 is handled
  above (L823) because fabs() is exact.  Also added test (checked
  with mpmath and gmpy2) for second condition on that line.
- some trivial tests for isclose (cover all conditions on L1217-1218)
- add comment for uncovered L1018
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting review label Feb 20, 2023
@skirpichev
Merge branch 'main' into cmath-cov
b54488e
@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja added skip issue skip news labels Feb 20, 2023
@mdickinson
mdickinson self-requested a review February 20, 2023 20:59
@skirpichev

skirpichev commented Feb 21, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

BTW, there are some places with workarounds for systems with unsigned zeros (e.g. this or this). Does it make sense to keep that after #102046?

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

mdickinson
mdickinson reviewed Feb 22, 2023
View reviewed changes
Comment thread Lib/test/cmath_testcases.txt Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@mdickinson
Fix testcase to use correct rounding
1387cc2
mdickinson
mdickinson approved these changes Feb 22, 2023
View reviewed changes

@mdickinson mdickinson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM; I took the liberty of fixing the sqrt test value. (The values in cmath_testcases.txt should all be the "ideal" values - i.e., those that would arise from a perfectly correctly-rounded implementation.)

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting review labels Feb 22, 2023
@mdickinson

mdickinson commented Feb 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Does it make sense to keep that after #102046?

Let's leave as is - they're not causing any problems, so there's no reason to change. And who knows - we might encounter some situation in the future where we want this code to work on systems without signed zeros ...

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@mdickinson
mdickinson merged commit 592f65f into python:main Feb 22, 2023
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting merge label Feb 22, 2023
carljm added a commit to carljm/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2023
@carljm
Merge branch 'main' into lockfreecp
b257a16
* main: (76 commits)
  Fix syntax error in struct doc example (python#102160)
  pythongh-99108: Import MD5 and SHA1 from HACL* (python#102089)
  pythonGH-101777: `queue.rst`: use 2 spaces after a period to be consistent. (python#102143)
  Few coverage nitpicks for the cmath module (python#102067)
  pythonGH-100982: Restrict `FOR_ITER_RANGE` to a single instruction to allow instrumentation. (pythonGH-101985)
  pythongh-102135: Update turtle docs to rename wikipedia demo to rosette (python#102137)
  pythongh-99942: python.pc on android/cygwin should link to libpython per configure.ac (pythonGH-100356)
  pythongh-95672 fix typo SkitTest to SkipTest (pythongh-102119)
  pythongh-101936: Update the default value of fp from io.StringIO to io.BytesIO (pythongh-102100)
  pythongh-102008: simplify test_except_star by using sys.exception() instead of sys.exc_info() (python#102009)
  pythongh-101903: Remove obsolete undefs for previously removed macros Py_EnterRecursiveCall and Py_LeaveRecursiveCall (python#101923)
  pythongh-100556: Improve clarity of `or` docs (python#100589)
  pythongh-101777: Make `PriorityQueue` docs slightly clearer (python#102026)
  pythongh-101965: Fix usage of Py_EnterRecursiveCall return value in _bisectmodule.c (pythonGH-101966)
  pythongh-101578: Amend exception docs (python#102057)
  pythongh-101961 fileinput.hookcompressed should not set the encoding value for the binary mode (pythongh-102068)
  pythongh-102056: Fix a few bugs in error handling of exception printing code (python#102078)
  pythongh-102011: use sys.exception() instead of sys.exc_info() in docs where possible (python#102012)
  pythongh-101566: Sync with zipp 3.14. (pythonGH-102018)
  pythonGH-99818: improve the documentation for zipfile.Path and Traversable (pythonGH-101589)
  ...
@skirpichev
skirpichev deleted the cmath-cov branch February 23, 2023 02:21
@skirpichev

skirpichev commented Feb 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Let's leave as is - they're not causing any problems, so there's no reason to change.

Then it probably does make sense

  1. to document branch cuts conventions for non-IEEE 754 systems (in sources, not user docs)
  2. and/or add comments in other places with similar workarounds. I doubt this stuff will be obvious for a reader, coming with the current module docs in mind.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@mdickinson

mdickinson commented Feb 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Then it probably does make sense [...]

No, sorry, not worth it. We can worry about that if a relevant system ever shows up.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@skirpichev skirpichev mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2023
gh-102837: few coverage nitpicks for the math module #102523
Merged
@skirpichev skirpichev mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2023
gh-102837: Increase test coverage for the math module #110000
Closed
@skirpichev skirpichev mentioned this pull request Jul 2, 2024
Remove remnants of support for non-IEEE 754 systems from cmathmodule.c #121268
Closed
JelleZijlstra pushed a commit to JelleZijlstra/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
@skirpichev @mdickinson @JelleZijlstra
Few coverage nitpicks for the cmath module (python#102067)
a8fb878
- partial tests for cosh/sinh overflows (L535 and L771).  I doubt
  both ||-ed conditions could be tested.
- removed inaccessible case in sqrt (L832): ax=ay=0 is handled
  above (L823) because fabs() is exact.  Also added test (checked
  with mpmath and gmpy2) for second condition on that line.
- some trivial tests for isclose (cover all conditions on L1217-1218)
- add comment for uncovered L1018

Co-authored-by: Mark Dickinson <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer
@mdickinson mdickinson mdickinson approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip issue skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@skirpichev @mdickinson @hauntsaninja @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.